Hi Robert, Would it be possible to fold in also LUCENE-4286? I don't see the 3.6 backport listed in the JIRA issue, but it would be nice to have that flag available for people still on the 3.6.x branch.
Tom On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless > > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: > >> > >> [javadoc] > /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: > >> warning - @return tag has no arguments. > >> > >> It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.0_07. > > > > Thanks Mike... can you fix? I have no idea why different versions of > > java7 have different levels of pickiness. > > > > This is no issue for e.g. 4.x+, because we have the eclipse checker as > > part of our build which fails on this. But for 3.x we don't have as > > many tools unfortunately. > > > > I dont think we should put a lot of effort into this: but when > > backporting bugfixes to old branches like this please be really > > careful about this stuff. > > OK I committed that fix and a couple other javadocs warnings. > > Thanks for spinning 3.6.2 Robert! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
