I don't think these javadocs warnings require a re-spin so +1 to release current artifacts.
Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Michael McCandless >> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >>> Hmm my smoke test run was angry about this javadocs warning: >>> >>> [javadoc] >>> /l/36x/tmp/unpack/apache-solr-3.6.2/lucene/contrib/facet/src/java/org/apache/lucene/facet/taxonomy/writercache/lru/NameIntCacheLRU.java:76: >>> warning - @return tag has no arguments. >>> >>> It hit this when running javadocs with 1.7.0_07. >> >> Thanks Mike... can you fix? I have no idea why different versions of >> java7 have different levels of pickiness. >> >> This is no issue for e.g. 4.x+, because we have the eclipse checker as >> part of our build which fails on this. But for 3.x we don't have as >> many tools unfortunately. >> >> I dont think we should put a lot of effort into this: but when >> backporting bugfixes to old branches like this please be really >> careful about this stuff. > > OK I committed that fix and a couple other javadocs warnings. > > Thanks for spinning 3.6.2 Robert! > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
