Two more questions :

1. How much of the original Luke.java has yet to be modularised?

2. What are the new APIs in Lucene 4.1 and 4.2 that need immediate
attention to be updated?


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Ajay Bhat <a.ajay.b...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The most pressing issue is that I need a mentor for this project by
> Wednesday, 17th July 2013 if I'm to do it for the ASF-ICFOSS program [1].
> Currently I've not found any mentors. Would anyone here please consent to
> be a mentor for this project so I can include you in my proposal?
>
> For the project I've decided to use Apache Pivot and familiarize myself
> with it, going throught the tutorials ASAP
>
> There's some more questions I have:
>
> 1. The original version by Andrzej [2] I have checked out in Eclipse but I
> can't run it. It's all under mainly a huge Luke.java file. Just want to
> check that the UI is same as that in the sandboxed version in Lucene.
>
> 2. There are various plugins that require Luke.java to be imported. But
> there's also a Shell.java plugin [3] that doesn't need any import needed.
> Does this mean it can be ported directly or is it kept for future
> improvement? If its the latter I guess a CMD Interface suggested by Jack
> Krupansky could be implemented using this class.
>
>
> [1] http://community.apache.org/mentoringprogramme-icfoss-pilot.html
>
> [2] https://code.google.com/p/luke/
>
> [3] org.getopt.luke.plugins.Shell
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
>> On 7/15/2013 9:15 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
>> > I disagree with this completely. Solr is last priority
>>
>> I'm on the Solr side of things, with only the tiniest knowledge or
>> interest in hacking on Lucene.  Despite that, I have to agree with
>> Robert here.
>>
>> Let's make sure the Luke module is very solid and prove that we can keep
>> it operational through 2-3 full minor release cycles before we try to
>> integrate it into Solr.
>>
>> We already have luke functionality in the Solr UI.  Compared to the real
>> thing it might be a band-aid, but it works.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shawn
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to