Yes, it's in the public repo - see my recent comment on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2562 - it's really simple to check it out and run it.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Ashish <paliwalash...@gmail.com> wrote: > @Mark - Do you have it in public repo? > > > > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> My feeling is that what we need most is what I've been working on >> (surprise, surprise :) ) >> >> We need a simple Java app, very similar to the std Luke app. We need it >> to be Apache licensed all the way through. We need it to be fully >> integrated as a module. We need it to be straightforward enough that any of >> the Lucene/Solr committers can easily work on it and update it as API's >> change. GWT is probably a stretch for that goal - Apache Pivot is pretty >> straight forward though - for any reasonable Java developer. I picked it up >> in absolutely no time to build the thing from scratch - modifying it is 10 >> times easier. The backend code is all java, the layout and widgets all XML. >> >> I've been pushing towards that goal (over the years now) with Luke ALE >> (Apache Lucene Edition). >> >> It's not a straight port of Luke with thinlet to Luke with Apache Pivot - >> Luke has 90% of it's code in one huge class - I've already been working on >> modularizing that code as I've moved it over - not too heavily because that >> would have made it difficult to keep porting code, but a good start. Now >> that the majority of features have been moved over, it's probably easier to >> keep refactoring - which is needed, because another very important missing >> piece is unit tests - and good units tests will require even more >> refactoring of the code. >> >> I also think a GWT version - something that could probably run nicely >> with Solr - would be awesome. But way down the line in priority for me. We >> need something very close to Lucene that the committers will push up the >> hill as they push Lucene. >> >> - Mark >> >> On Jul 15, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I disagree with this completely. Solr is last priority >> On Jul 15, 2013 6:14 AM, "Jack Krupansky" <j...@basetechnology.com> >> wrote: >> >>> My personal thoughts/preferences/suggestions for Luke: >>> >>> 1. Need a clean Luke Java library – heavily unit-tested. As integrated >>> with Lucene as possible. >>> 2. A simple command line interface – always useful. >>> 3. A Solr plugin handler – based on #1. Good for apps as well as Admin >>> UI. Nice to be able to curl a request to look at a specific doc, for >>> example. >>> 4. GUI fully integrated with the new Solr Web Admin UI. A separate UI... >>> sucks. >>> 5. Any additional, un-untegrated GUI is icing on the cake and not really >>> desirable for Solr. May be great for Elasticsearch and other Lucene-based >>> apps, but Solr should be the #1 priority – after #1 and #2 above. >>> >>> -- Jack Krupansky >>> >>> *From:* Dmitry Kan <dmitry.luc...@gmail.com> >>> *Sent:* Monday, July 15, 2013 8:54 AM >>> *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org >>> *Subject:* Re: Request for Mentor for LUCENE-2562 : Make Luke a >>> Lucene/Solr Module >>> >>> Hello guys, >>> >>> Indeed, the GWT port is work in progress and far from done. The driving >>> factor here was to be able to later integrate luke into the solr admin as >>> well as have the standalone webapp for non-solr users. >>> There is (was?) a luke stats handler in the solr ui, that printed some >>> stats on the index. That could be substituted with the GWT app. >>> >>> The code isn't yet ready to see the light. So if it makes more sense for >>> Ajay to work on the existing jira with the Apache Pivot implementation, I >>> would say go ahead. >>> >>> In the current port effort (the aforementioned github's fork) the UI is >>> the original one, developed by Andrzej. Beside the UI rework there is >>> plenty things to port / verify (like e.g. Hadoop plugin) against the latest >>> lucene versions. >>> >>> See the readme.md: https://github.com/dmitrykey/luke >>> >>> >>> Whichever way's taken, hopefully we end up having stable releases of >>> luke :) >>> >>> Dmitry Kan >>> >>> >>> On 14 July 2013 22:38, Andrzej Bialecki <a...@getopt.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/14/13 5:04 AM, Ajay Bhat wrote: >>>> >>>>> Shawn and Andrzej, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for answering my questions. I've looked over the code done by >>>>> Dmitry and I'll look into what I can do to help with the UI porting in >>>>> future. >>>>> >>>>> I was actually thinking of doing this JIRA as a project by myself with >>>>> some assistance from the community after getting a mentor for the ASF >>>>> ICFOSS program, which I haven't found yet. It would be great if I could >>>>> get one of you guys as a mentor. >>>>> >>>>> As the UI work has been mostly done by others like Dmitry Kan, I don't >>>>> think I need to work on that majorly for now. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's far from done - he just started the process. >>>> >>>> >>>>> What other work is there to be done that I can do as a project? Any new >>>>> features or improvements? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ajay >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 14, 2013 1:54 AM, "Andrzej Bialecki" <a...@getopt.org >>>>> <mailto:a...@getopt.org>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 7/13/13 8:56 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 7/13/2013 3:15 AM, Ajay Bhat wrote: >>>>> >>>>> One more question : What version of Lucene does Luke >>>>> currently support >>>>> right now? I saw a comment on the issue page that it >>>>> doesn't >>>>> support the >>>>> Lucene 4.1 and 4.2 trunk. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The official Luke project only has versions up through >>>>> 4.0.0-ALPHA. >>>>> >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/luke/ >>>>> >>>>> There is a forked project that has produced Luke for newer >>>>> Lucene versions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://java.net/projects/__**opengrok/downloads<https://java.net/projects/__opengrok/downloads> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <https://java.net/projects/**opengrok/downloads<https://java.net/projects/opengrok/downloads> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> I can't seem to locate any information about how they have >>>>> licensed the >>>>> newer versions, and I'm not really sure where the source code >>>>> is >>>>> living. >>>>> >>>>> Regarding a question you asked earlier, Luke is a standalone >>>>> program. >>>>> It does include Lucene classes in the "lukeall" version of the >>>>> executable jar. >>>>> >>>>> Luke may have some uses as a library, but I think that most >>>>> people run >>>>> it separately. There is partial Luke functionality embedded in >>>>> the Solr >>>>> admin UI, but I don't know whether that is something cooked up >>>>> by Solr >>>>> devs or if it shares actual code with Luke. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ajay, >>>>> >>>>> Luke is a standalone GUI application, not a library. It uses a >>>>> custom version of Thinlet GUI toolkit, which is no longer >>>>> maintained, and it's LGPL licensed, so Luke can't be contributed to >>>>> the Lucene project as is. >>>>> >>>>> Recently several people expressed interest in porting Luke to some >>>>> other GUI toolkit that is Apache-friendly. See the discussion here: >>>>> >>>>> http://groups.google.com/d/__**msg/luke-discuss/S_Whwg2jwmA/_** >>>>> _9JgqKIe5aiwJ<http://groups.google.com/d/__msg/luke-discuss/S_Whwg2jwmA/__9JgqKIe5aiwJ> >>>>> >>>>> <http://groups.google.com/d/**msg/luke-discuss/S_Whwg2jwmA/** >>>>> 9JgqKIe5aiwJ<http://groups.google.com/d/msg/luke-discuss/S_Whwg2jwmA/9JgqKIe5aiwJ> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> In particular, there's a fork by Dmitry Kan - he plans to integrate >>>>> other patches and forks, and to port Luke from Thinlet to GWT and >>>>> sync it with the latest version of Lucene. I think you should >>>>> coordinate your efforts with him and other contributors that work >>>>> on >>>>> that code base. This fork is Apache-licensed and the long-term plan >>>>> is to contribute it back to Lucene once the porting is done. >>>>> >>>>> The Pivot-based port of Luke that is in the Lucene sandbox is in an >>>>> early stage. I'm not sure Mark Miller has time to work on it due to >>>>> his involvement in SolrCloud development. >>>>> >>>>> The Luke handler in Solr is a completely different code base, and >>>>> it >>>>> shares only the name with the Luke application. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Andrzej Bialecki >>>>> http://www.sigram.com, blog http://www.sigram.com/blog >>>>> ___.,___,___,___,_._. __________________<><_________**_____________ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [___||.__|__/|__||\/|: Information Retrieval, System Integration >>>>> ___|||__||..\|..||..|: Contact: info at sigram dot com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------**__----------------------------** >>>>> --__--------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.**__org >>>>> >>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@**lucene.apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> <mailto:dev-help@lucene.**apache.org <dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> Andrzej Bialecki >>>> http://www.sigram.com, blog http://www.sigram.com/blog >>>> ___.,___,___,___,_._. __________________<><_________**___________ >>>> [___||.__|__/|__||\/|: Information Retrieval, System Integration >>>> ___|||__||..\|..||..|: Contact: info at sigram dot com >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>>> --------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>> dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.**org<dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > thanks > ashish > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal > -- - Mark
