[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13794190#comment-13794190
]
Nik Everett commented on LUCENE-5274:
-------------------------------------
I'm having a look at what I can do to pull MergedIterator into the util package
and give it nice unit tests. Almost done with that and I should be able to
spin another version of this patch. I'm not exactly sure of a good way to test
the synonym stuff in FastVectorHighlighterTest - I don't see a mock Synonym
filter.
> Teach fast FastVectorHighlighter to highlight "child fields" with parent
> fields
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5274
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5274
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/other
> Reporter: Nik Everett
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-5274.patch
>
>
> I've been messing around with the FastVectorHighlighter and it looks like I
> can teach it to highlight matches on "child fields". Like this query:
> foo:scissors foo_exact:running
> would highlight foo like this:
> <em>running</em> with <em>scissors</em>
> Where foo is stored WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS and foo_plain is an unstored copy
> of foo a different analyzer and its own WITH_POSITIONS_OFFSETS.
> This would make queries that perform weighted matches against different
> analyzers much more convenient to highlight.
> I have working code and test cases but they are hacked into Elasticsearch.
> I'd love to Lucene-ify if you'll take them.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
