Much as i will be happy to see Mahout in cdh u2, I also support Grant in a
sense that projects are community driven per asf philosophy. If corporations
want to push something thru, the only way they should be able doing that is
thru their empoyees' individual clout in the community per asf voting.
Marketing influence rarely motivates to do the best possible science job.
(IMHO)
On Oct 7, 2011 9:00 AM, "Dmitriy Lyubimov" <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I support (and supported before) the annotations as maturity tags.
>
> Also command line API seems to be good. Maybe some solver apis could be
> standardized in some ways.
>
> AbstractJob as it currently exists is more a Tool than an individual step
in
> a pipeline, perhaps historically driven by a fact that most Mahout
pipelines
> are one step generic job agnstic of MR specific parameters passed to them,
> so this needs some model design work before approach is truly applicable
to
> any given pipeline. Pipeline execution plan also may be not so trivial
which
> tools such as oozie exist. Because doing it with utter flexibility is
> expensive, and because individual steps are implementation detail not
> exposed in API, I don't see big urgency in forcing any abstract
> functionality in an internal pipeline execution for as long as they merge
> managed parameters with unmanaged configuration passed in via Tool like
> base.
> On Oct 7, 2011 6:14 AM, "Grant Ingersoll" <gsing...@apache.org> wrote:
