Can someone please send a link to the hangout? Thanks.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org>wrote: > > On Oct 15, 2013, at 1:21 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Will schedule a hangout for this Thursday - 7pm (Eastern Time) > tentatively. > > > > Sorry, just catching up. I can't make this week, but can next. Feel free > to go ahead w/o me at this point, given the momentum. > > > I would like us to first discuss about Mahout 0.9 release, will send out > an agenda once I schedule it. > > > > Regards, > > Suneel > > > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:24 AM, Saikat Kanjilal < > sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Following up , Suneel/Grant are we still on for meeting this week on a > google hangout, would love to neet this week. > > > >> From: sxk1...@hotmail.com > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org > >> Subject: RE: Mahout's future > >> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 07:00:50 -0700 > >> > >> +1Can you send out a quick agenda (hopefully with my input > incorporated) before the hangout?Regards > >>> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 03:58:10 -0700 > >>> From: suneel_mar...@yahoo.com > >>> Subject: Re: Mahout's future > >>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org > >>> > >>> Grant would be available the week of Oct 14 for a hangout > (tentatively). > >>> We could go ahead and schedule one next week if there's (and seems > very much like it) enough response. I can go ahead and facilitate one. > >>> > >>> I will be 100% focused on Mahout from next week once I start at my new > job from Monday. > >>> > >>> Regarding building something for Deep Learning, Yexi's patch for MLP > (see M-1265) may be a good place to refactor/start thinking about the > foundations. > >>> I guess Ted is alluring to build something like what's been described > in the Google paper (see > http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~ranzato/publications/DistBeliefNIPS2012_withAppendix.pdf). > Correct? > >>> > >>> > >>> Suneel > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ________________________________ > >>> From: Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > >>> To: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org> > >>> Cc: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org> > >>> Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2013 2:10 AM > >>> Subject: Re: Mahout's future > >>> > >>> > >>> Saikat > >>> > >>> These are all good suggestions. I would have a hard time suggesting a > prioritization of them. > >>> > >>> Does anybody remember what grant said about having another hangout? > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> On Oct 6, 2013, at 7:15, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I wanted to mention a few other things:1)It might be useful to take > and embed a few already productionalized use cases into the integration > tests in mahout, this will help additional users get on board faster2) Deep > learning is really interesting, however I'd like to help research some > common use cases first before tying this into mahout3) It'd be good to put > some thought into documenting when you would choose what type of algorithm > given a production machine learning recommendation system to build, this > would give more visibility for users into choosing the right mixture of > algorithms to build a production ready recommender, often what I've found > is that a bulk of the time in building productionalized recommenders is > spent cleaning and filtering noisy data4) I'd like to also explore how to > tie in machine learning algorithms into real time systems built using > twitter storm (http://storm-project.net/), it seems that industry more > and more is > > wanting > >>> to do real time analytics on the fly, I'm curious what type of > algorithms we'd need for this and back propagate these into mahout > >>>> > >>>> It'd be good to meet like minded devs together locally (Seattle) or > over gtalk/conference to talk through possibilities. > >>>> Regards > >>>>> From: ted.dunn...@gmail.com > >>>>> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 18:13:40 -0700 > >>>>> Subject: Re: Mahout's future > >>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Does it make sense to have a quick meeting of interested developers > over > >>>>>> google chat/conference rather than email to discuss and assign > folks to > >>>>>> specifics? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>> > >>>>> Great idea. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think that Grant may have been organizing a hangout. > >>>> > >> > > -------------------------------------------- > Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers > http://www.lucidworks.com > > > > > > -- Thanks.
