Check out the recent drill mailing list for a way to have a long standing URL 
for a hangout.  

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 15, 2013, at 6:21, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Will schedule a hangout for this Thursday - 7pm (Eastern Time) tentatively.
> 
> I would like us to first discuss about Mahout 0.9 release, will send out an 
> agenda once I schedule it.
> 
> Regards,
> Suneel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:24 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Following up , Suneel/Grant are we still on for meeting this week on a google 
> hangout, would love to neet this week.
> 
>> From: sxk1...@hotmail.com
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Mahout's future
>> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 07:00:50 -0700
>> 
>> +1Can you send out a quick agenda (hopefully with my input incorporated) 
>> before the hangout?Regards
>>> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 03:58:10 -0700
>>> From: suneel_mar...@yahoo.com
>>> Subject: Re: Mahout's future
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> 
>>> Grant would be available the week of Oct 14 for a hangout (tentatively).
>>> We could go ahead and schedule one next week if there's (and seems very 
>>> much like it) enough response.  I can go ahead and facilitate one.
>>> 
>>> I will be 100% focused on Mahout from next week once I start at my new job 
>>> from Monday. 
>>> 
>>> Regarding building something for Deep Learning, Yexi's patch for MLP (see 
>>> M-1265) may be a good place to refactor/start thinking about the 
>>> foundations.
>>> I guess Ted is alluring to build something like what's been described in 
>>> the Google paper (see 
>>> http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~ranzato/publications/DistBeliefNIPS2012_withAppendix.pdf).
>>>  Correct?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Suneel
>>>   
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>>   From: Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
>>> To: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org> 
>>> Cc: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org> 
>>> Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2013 2:10 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Mahout's future
>>>   
>>> 
>>> Saikat
>>> 
>>> These are all good suggestions.  I would have a hard time suggesting a 
>>> prioritization of them.  
>>> 
>>> Does anybody remember what grant said about having another hangout?  
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Oct 6, 2013, at 7:15, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I wanted to mention a few other things:1)It might be useful to take and 
>>>> embed a few already productionalized use cases into the integration tests 
>>>> in mahout, this will help additional users get on board faster2) Deep 
>>>> learning is really interesting, however I'd like to help research some 
>>>> common use cases first before tying this into mahout3) It'd be good to put 
>>>> some thought into  documenting when you would choose what type of 
>>>> algorithm given a production machine learning recommendation system to 
>>>> build, this would give more visibility for users into choosing the right 
>>>> mixture of algorithms to build a production ready recommender, often what 
>>>> I've found is that a bulk of the time in building productionalized 
>>>> recommenders is spent cleaning and filtering noisy data4) I'd like to also 
>>>> explore how to tie in machine learning algorithms into real time systems 
>>>> built using twitter storm (http://storm-project.net/), it seems that 
>>>> industry more and more is
> wanting
>>>   to do real time analytics on the fly, I'm curious what type of algorithms 
>>> we'd need for this and back propagate these into mahout
>>>> 
>>>> It'd be good to meet like minded devs  together locally (Seattle) or over 
>>>> gtalk/conference to talk through possibilities.
>>>> Regards
>>>>> From: ted.dunn...@gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 18:13:40 -0700
>>>>> Subject: Re: Mahout's future
>>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Does it make sense to have a quick meeting of interested developers over
>>>>>> google chat/conference rather than email to discuss and assign folks to
>>>>>> specifics?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Great idea.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think that Grant may have been organizing a hangout.
>>>>                         
>>                            

Reply via email to