Check out the recent drill mailing list for a way to have a long standing URL for a hangout.
Sent from my iPhone On Oct 15, 2013, at 6:21, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Will schedule a hangout for this Thursday - 7pm (Eastern Time) tentatively. > > I would like us to first discuss about Mahout 0.9 release, will send out an > agenda once I schedule it. > > Regards, > Suneel > > > > > On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:24 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > Following up , Suneel/Grant are we still on for meeting this week on a google > hangout, would love to neet this week. > >> From: sxk1...@hotmail.com >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Mahout's future >> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 07:00:50 -0700 >> >> +1Can you send out a quick agenda (hopefully with my input incorporated) >> before the hangout?Regards >>> Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 03:58:10 -0700 >>> From: suneel_mar...@yahoo.com >>> Subject: Re: Mahout's future >>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org >>> >>> Grant would be available the week of Oct 14 for a hangout (tentatively). >>> We could go ahead and schedule one next week if there's (and seems very >>> much like it) enough response. I can go ahead and facilitate one. >>> >>> I will be 100% focused on Mahout from next week once I start at my new job >>> from Monday. >>> >>> Regarding building something for Deep Learning, Yexi's patch for MLP (see >>> M-1265) may be a good place to refactor/start thinking about the >>> foundations. >>> I guess Ted is alluring to build something like what's been described in >>> the Google paper (see >>> http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~ranzato/publications/DistBeliefNIPS2012_withAppendix.pdf). >>> Correct? >>> >>> >>> Suneel >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> >>> To: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org> >>> Cc: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org> >>> Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2013 2:10 AM >>> Subject: Re: Mahout's future >>> >>> >>> Saikat >>> >>> These are all good suggestions. I would have a hard time suggesting a >>> prioritization of them. >>> >>> Does anybody remember what grant said about having another hangout? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Oct 6, 2013, at 7:15, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I wanted to mention a few other things:1)It might be useful to take and >>>> embed a few already productionalized use cases into the integration tests >>>> in mahout, this will help additional users get on board faster2) Deep >>>> learning is really interesting, however I'd like to help research some >>>> common use cases first before tying this into mahout3) It'd be good to put >>>> some thought into documenting when you would choose what type of >>>> algorithm given a production machine learning recommendation system to >>>> build, this would give more visibility for users into choosing the right >>>> mixture of algorithms to build a production ready recommender, often what >>>> I've found is that a bulk of the time in building productionalized >>>> recommenders is spent cleaning and filtering noisy data4) I'd like to also >>>> explore how to tie in machine learning algorithms into real time systems >>>> built using twitter storm (http://storm-project.net/), it seems that >>>> industry more and more is > wanting >>> to do real time analytics on the fly, I'm curious what type of algorithms >>> we'd need for this and back propagate these into mahout >>>> >>>> It'd be good to meet like minded devs together locally (Seattle) or over >>>> gtalk/conference to talk through possibilities. >>>> Regards >>>>> From: ted.dunn...@gmail.com >>>>> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 18:13:40 -0700 >>>>> Subject: Re: Mahout's future >>>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Does it make sense to have a quick meeting of interested developers over >>>>>> google chat/conference rather than email to discuss and assign folks to >>>>>> specifics? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> >>>>> Great idea. >>>>> >>>>> I think that Grant may have been organizing a hangout. >>>> >>