Doesnt work for me. Friday is better, or thrusday earlier afternoon. I d
also appreciate automatic calendar invitations to pmc if at all possible.

D
On Oct 14, 2013 10:21 PM, "Suneel Marthi" <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Will schedule a hangout for this Thursday - 7pm (Eastern Time) tentatively.
>
> I would like us to first discuss about Mahout 0.9 release, will send out
> an agenda once I schedule it.
>
> Regards,
> Suneel
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:24 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <
> sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Following up , Suneel/Grant are we still on for meeting this week on a
> google hangout, would love to neet this week.
>
> > From: sxk1...@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Mahout's future
> > Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 07:00:50 -0700
> >
> > +1Can you send out a quick agenda (hopefully with my input incorporated)
> before the hangout?Regards
> > > Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 03:58:10 -0700
> > > From: suneel_mar...@yahoo.com
> > > Subject: Re: Mahout's future
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > >
> > > Grant would be available the week of Oct 14 for a hangout
> (tentatively).
> > > We could go ahead and schedule one next week if there's (and seems
> very much like it) enough response.  I can go ahead and facilitate one.
> > >
> > > I will be 100% focused on Mahout from next week once I start at my new
> job from Monday.
> > >
> > > Regarding building something for Deep Learning, Yexi's patch for MLP
> (see M-1265) may be a good place to refactor/start thinking about the
> foundations.
> > > I guess Ted is alluring to build something like what's been described
> in the Google paper (see
> http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~ranzato/publications/DistBeliefNIPS2012_withAppendix.pdf).
> Correct?
> > >
> > >
> > > Suneel
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
> > > To: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org>
> > > Cc: "dev@mahout.apache.org" <dev@mahout.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2013 2:10 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Mahout's future
> > >
> > >
> > > Saikat
> > >
> > > These are all good suggestions.  I would have a hard time suggesting a
> prioritization of them.
> > >
> > > Does anybody remember what grant said about having another hangout?
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > On Oct 6, 2013, at 7:15, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I wanted to mention a few other things:1)It might be useful to take
> and embed a few already productionalized use cases into the integration
> tests in mahout, this will help additional users get on board faster2) Deep
> learning is really interesting, however I'd like to help research some
> common use cases first before tying this into mahout3) It'd be good to put
> some thought into  documenting when you would choose what type of algorithm
> given a production machine learning recommendation system to build, this
> would give more visibility for users into choosing the right mixture of
> algorithms to build a production ready recommender, often what I've found
> is that a bulk of the time in building productionalized recommenders is
> spent cleaning and filtering noisy data4) I'd like to also explore how to
> tie in machine learning algorithms into real time systems built using
> twitter storm (http://storm-project.net/), it seems that industry more
> and more is
>  wanting
> > >  to do real time analytics on the fly, I'm curious what type of
> algorithms we'd need for this and back propagate these into mahout
> > > >
> > > > It'd be good to meet like minded devs  together locally (Seattle) or
> over gtalk/conference to talk through possibilities.
> > > > Regards
> > > >> From: ted.dunn...@gmail.com
> > > >> Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 18:13:40 -0700
> > > >> Subject: Re: Mahout's future
> > > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Saikat Kanjilal <
> sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Does it make sense to have a quick meeting of interested
> developers over
> > > >>> google chat/conference rather than email to discuss and assign
> folks to
> > > >>> specifics?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thoughts?
> > > >>
> > > >> Great idea.
> > > >>
> > > >> I think that Grant may have been organizing a hangout.
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to