There is an RISC channel for mahout on freenode that's still active . Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Andrew Musselman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > How about reviving/advertising an IRC channel so people could hop on > whenever they're free, see if that gains any momentum. > > >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We can have more than one hangout to cover multiple time zones/work >> requirements. Each meeting should forward notes to the mailing list. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Giorgio Zoppi <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> So Friday afterwork_ >>> >>> >>> 2014-03-03 18:56 GMT+01:00 Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Grant had setup a Google Hangout for Mahout sometime last year before >> 0.8 >>>> release. I had one setup too for 0.9 release. I definitely wouldn't >> want >>>> to have a hangout on Saturday or weekend. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday, March 3, 2014 12:52 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Happy to organize a google hangout. That has the advantage of allowing >>>> more attendees and supporting YouTube archiving. >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 9:34, Giorgio Zoppi <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello All, >>>>> Dr.Dunning could you set a meeting next Sat morning, so we can chat >> and >>>>> discuss by skype improvements and what to do and indentify volunteer >>> and >>>>> tasks. >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> Giorgio >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2014-03-03 18:30 GMT+01:00 peng <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Me three >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun 02 Mar 2014 11:45:33 AM EST, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ravi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Good points. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Ravi Mummulla < >>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Natively support Windows (guidance, etc. No documentation exists >>>> today, >>>>>>>> for instance) >>>>>>> There is a bit of demand for that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Faster time to first application (from discovery to first >>> application >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> currently takes a non-trivial amount of effort; how can we lower >> the >>>> bar >>>>>>>> and reduce the friction for adoption?) >>>>>>> There is huge evidence that this is important. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Better documenting use cases with working samples/examples >>>>>>>> (Documentation >>>>>>>> on https://mahout.apache.org/users/basics/algorithms.html is >> spread >>>> out >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> there is too much focus on algorithms as opposed to use cases - >> this >>>> is >>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>> adoption blocker) >>>>>>> This is also important. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Uniformity of the API set across all algorithms (are we providing >>> the >>>>>>>> same experience across all APIs?) >>>>>>> And many people have been tripped up by this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Measuring/publishing scalability metrics of various algorithms >>> (why >>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> we want users to adopt Mahout vs. other frameworks for ML at >> scale?) >>>>>>> I don't see this as important as some of your other points, but is >>>> still >>>>>>> useful. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta >>>>> para hacerte respirar y vivir en me. >>>>> "Favola -Moda". >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta >>> para hacerte respirar y vivir en me. >>> "Favola -Moda". >>
