IRC channel Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:58 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is an RISC channel for mahout on freenode that's still active . > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Andrew Musselman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> How about reviving/advertising an IRC channel so people could hop on >> whenever they're free, see if that gains any momentum. >> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> We can have more than one hangout to cover multiple time zones/work >>> requirements. Each meeting should forward notes to the mailing list. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Giorgio Zoppi <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> So Friday afterwork_ >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014-03-03 18:56 GMT+01:00 Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> Grant had setup a Google Hangout for Mahout sometime last year before >>> 0.8 >>>>> release. I had one setup too for 0.9 release. I definitely wouldn't >>> want >>>>> to have a hangout on Saturday or weekend. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Monday, March 3, 2014 12:52 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Happy to organize a google hangout. That has the advantage of allowing >>>>> more attendees and supporting YouTube archiving. >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 9:34, Giorgio Zoppi <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>> Dr.Dunning could you set a meeting next Sat morning, so we can chat >>> and >>>>>> discuss by skype improvements and what to do and indentify volunteer >>>> and >>>>>> tasks. >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> Giorgio >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2014-03-03 18:30 GMT+01:00 peng <[email protected]>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Me three >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun 02 Mar 2014 11:45:33 AM EST, Ted Dunning wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ravi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good points. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Ravi Mummulla < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Natively support Windows (guidance, etc. No documentation exists >>>>> today, >>>>>>>>> for instance) >>>>>>>> There is a bit of demand for that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Faster time to first application (from discovery to first >>>> application >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> currently takes a non-trivial amount of effort; how can we lower >>> the >>>>> bar >>>>>>>>> and reduce the friction for adoption?) >>>>>>>> There is huge evidence that this is important. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Better documenting use cases with working samples/examples >>>>>>>>> (Documentation >>>>>>>>> on https://mahout.apache.org/users/basics/algorithms.html is >>> spread >>>>> out >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> there is too much focus on algorithms as opposed to use cases - >>> this >>>>> is >>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>> adoption blocker) >>>>>>>> This is also important. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Uniformity of the API set across all algorithms (are we providing >>>> the >>>>>>>>> same experience across all APIs?) >>>>>>>> And many people have been tripped up by this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Measuring/publishing scalability metrics of various algorithms >>>> (why >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>> we want users to adopt Mahout vs. other frameworks for ML at >>> scale?) >>>>>>>> I don't see this as important as some of your other points, but is >>>>> still >>>>>>>> useful. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta >>>>>> para hacerte respirar y vivir en me. >>>>>> "Favola -Moda". >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta >>>> para hacerte respirar y vivir en me. >>>> "Favola -Moda". >>>
