On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 13:57 +0200, Charles-H.Schulz wrote:
[snip]
> This is where things start to get interesting. This customer is the
> Scottish Police; not a candy retailer. They certainly have some very
> sensitive data on their documents or somewhere on their servers and
> they'd let MS Office 2003 and XP, that is, an alien company take
> control
> over their data? Now think about that one: Sun has some manufacturing
> plan in Scotland. What SO/OOo offers is invaluable: a truly open
> document file format; and besides, by buying at Sun you help foster
> the
> local economy. I can't imagine the Scottish police CIO/IT director
> being
> lavishly bribed by MS. It's way too simple, and there must be other
> reasons to this drawback.

It was Central Scotland Police - just one of the police authorities
within Scotland. I'm not sure of their exact geographic boundaries but
it probably does include Sun's facility at Linlithgow. Sun wouldn't view
them as a particularly large account though.

The UK police forces have traditionally been very protective of their
independence, including their IT departments. This has led to some very
public failures of communication in recent high-profile cases. So put
yourself in David Stirling's position - you're the new boss and you find
your department is running something different on the desktop to every
other force in the UK. 

It's not a question of bribery - the cut-price deal for MS software has
already been signed with the OGC (a central UK government purchasing
body). All you have to do is sign up - a simple piece of risk
mitigation.

If there are issues with MS - OGC takes the blame. If there are issues
with SO - or one of your officers emails an urgent document in .odt
format instead of .doc and some other police force calls foul - then
it's your neck on the line.

Classic risk mitigation, I'm afraid. David won't get fired for choosing
MS.

John


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to