Hi Daniel,
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
[...]
So his posting could be thought as some kind of provocation by
one or another
Which part of my post was provocation? If you show me I will
explain and/or apologise, and I'll know what to avoid doing in
the future.
You aren't so imprudent that you didn't know what several people
think about your posting - even before you got the answers.
I didn't say that you did provoke the marketing project - but it was
to be foreseen that there would be people feeling provoked:
I think it's great that Marketing has a new site outside
CollabNet.
Most of us know your opinion about CollabNet and the restrictions of
our homepage - and most of us know as well the problems between
oooauthors and documentation project as well.
So this line has to be taken as affront against CollabNet - and
against all the marketing project members that did tell you their
reasons not to leave the OOo site (more than once, I assume).
Is the marketing project working to replace
'marketing.openoffice.org' by 'ooosmp.homelinux.org' ?
Do you mean this question honestly? Even you know that there is no
attempt to do so. Marketing project is a central part of
OpenOffice.org and of course it has to stay at the OOo site.
Regarding your opinion about Collabnet (see above) it can't be read
but as a provocation.
When do you expect that the entire Marketing site will be a wiki?
And now - not a provocation either?
You know the restrictions and I'm sure you know all the reasons of
using the OOo web site and mailing lists too.
So this question is as rhetorical as the first one.
Don't tell me that you didn't know this before.
And I'd like to answer questions like this off list - they are not
really a marketing theme, I suppose.
Best regards
Bernhard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
