Alan,

To be honest, I don't know. The new toolbox concept help us with some
problems
but it create others. I believe we need to vote if the new concept will be
the future
or not. Am I right?

Best
Atenciosamente,
Rafael J. R. Novello

Skype: rafael.novello
Blog: http://rafanovello.blogspot.com.br/


Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 12:05, Alan Silva <ju...@apache.org> escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> One question here, if I will start with development about this R support at
> our engine, I will make it based on that we have today or in this new
> concept?
>
> Because I understood the concepts change a lot, right?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:56 PM Rafael Novello <
> rafa.reis.nove...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys!
> >
> > Despite issues related to performance and scalability I believe we need
> > to support R engines to cover the most part of data science/machine
> > learning
> > projects. Sometimes the code performance isn't the main question and the
> > team performance (how fast the team can delivery some value) is more
> > important.
> >
> > We are working (doing some POCs and trials) on a new toolbox concept to
> > facilitate the inclusion of new languages support. We could discuss this
> in
> > more details but I believe this kind of detail is not the focus for this
> > thread.
> >
> > +1 for R support
> >
> > Best!
> > Atenciosamente,
> > Rafael J. R. Novello
> >
> > Skype: rafael.novello
> > Blog: http://rafanovello.blogspot.com.br/
> >
> >
> > Em qui, 11 de out de 2018 às 23:01, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> > lucasbona...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >
> > > The idea is to create the R toolbox, providing a similar user
> experience
> > > that we provide in Python today.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Lucas
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:30 PM Alan Silva <alan.si...@cloudera.com
> > > .invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi to all,
> > > >
> > > > Yes, R would be a language like Python that I believe we should have
> in
> > > our
> > > > toolset and even as I had already raised it, I'm also very interested
> > in
> > > > working on this part of making a frontend with R.
> > > >
> > > > However, am I understanding after your last mail that the idea here
> is
> > to
> > > > do something different from what happens with Python today? Was not
> > that
> > > > clear to me? Or would it make a frontend similar to what we have in
> > > Python
> > > > and in the future for Scala too, correct?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 8:21 PM Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> > > lucasb...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi community, I already participated in several discussions with
> some
> > > of
> > > > > you regarding adding support to R on Marvin. Allowing users to
> write
> > > > > engines in R would be a great step for Marvin since that's the
> > primary
> > > > > language for many statisticians, physicists and math people.
> > > > >
> > > > > One of the points that always arise during those conversations is
> the
> > > > fact
> > > > > that R is not fast nor scalable, and it would be hard to either
> make
> > it
> > > > > process large chunks of data for training or make it support high
> > > > > throughput and have low latency for predictions. I want to start a
> > > thread
> > > > > on whether we should invest more time trying to add R support to
> > Marvin
> > > > or
> > > > > not. I invite you all to read about this related work:
> > > > > https://medium.com/graalvm/faster-r-with-fastr-4b8db0e0dceb
> > > > >
> > > > > I am looking forward to hearing opinions and ideas.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Lucas
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Alan Silva* | Solutions Architect
> > > > t. +55 (11) 99951- <0000000000>5242 e. alan.si...@cloudera.com
> > > > cloudera.com <http://www.cloudera.com>
> > > >
> > > > [image: Cloudera] <http://www.cloudera.com/>
> > > >
> > > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
> > > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
> > > Cloudera
> > > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to