This discussion is now duplicated at the thread with title "POCs, Prototypes, experiments"
Let's continue the discussion there. EOF On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:50 PM Daniel Takabayashi < daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/shajxIpLJHxxMbFgDXiPuhg/image?w=602&h=461&rev=1423&ac=1&parent=1ySERHGBXbHeyCMRookq5UfTuFkzzU0ugtjvR3rF3deY > > Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 11:20, Lucas Bonatto Miguel < > lucasb...@apache.org> escreveu: > > > Hey Daniel, I can't open your attachment. It is broken for me. Could you > > add a link to the image? > > > > Thanks, > > Lucas > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM Daniel Takabayashi < > > daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > [image: marvin-architecture-views (5).png] > > > attached the arch draw.. > > > > > > Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 17:09, Daniel Takabayashi < > > > daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> To try to give a little more details about this "new concept" that we > > >> want to bring to the marvin toolbox, I did this simple architecture > > draw. > > >> > > >> > > >> The general idea here is try to transform the toolbox something > > >> disconnected with the "language", something more agnostic. Also in > this > > new > > >> architecture we could use remote resource to process engines and make > > easy > > >> the support for new languages. > > >> > > >> This "new toolbox" will be the only thing that a Marvin user must to > > >> install and also we could start to support multiples O.S (once the > REPL > > is > > >> a dummy application that only interprets and by pass commands). > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Taka > > >> > > >> Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 12:44, Luciano Resende < > > luckbr1...@gmail.com> > > >> escreveu: > > >> > > >>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:56 PM Rafael Novello > > >>> <rafa.reis.nove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > Alan, > > >>> > > > >>> > To be honest, I don't know. The new toolbox concept help us with > some > > >>> > problems > > >>> > but it create others. I believe we need to vote if the new concept > > >>> will be > > >>> > the future > > >>> > or not. Am I right? > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> We usually only require a vote when there is no consensus on the > > >>> community. If the community agrees with the new direction, then there > > >>> isn't a need for a formal vote. In case there isn't agreement, a vote > > >>> can be a possibility to resolve the impasse. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Luciano Resende > > >>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > >>> > > >> > > >
