[image: marvin-architecture-views (5).png] attached the arch draw.. Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 17:09, Daniel Takabayashi < daniel.takabaya...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hi all, > > To try to give a little more details about this "new concept" that we want > to bring to the marvin toolbox, I did this simple architecture draw. > > > The general idea here is try to transform the toolbox something > disconnected with the "language", something more agnostic. Also in this new > architecture we could use remote resource to process engines and make easy > the support for new languages. > > This "new toolbox" will be the only thing that a Marvin user must to > install and also we could start to support multiples O.S (once the REPL is > a dummy application that only interprets and by pass commands). > > Regards, > Taka > > Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 12:44, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > escreveu: > >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:56 PM Rafael Novello >> <rafa.reis.nove...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Alan, >> > >> > To be honest, I don't know. The new toolbox concept help us with some >> > problems >> > but it create others. I believe we need to vote if the new concept will >> be >> > the future >> > or not. Am I right? >> > >> >> We usually only require a vote when there is no consensus on the >> community. If the community agrees with the new direction, then there >> isn't a need for a formal vote. In case there isn't agreement, a vote >> can be a possibility to resolve the impasse. >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> >
