Howdy Nikita, sure, it would be nice to see those numbers... :)
Thanks Tamas On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 2:25 PM Nikita Skvortsov <nikita.skvort...@jetbrains.com.invalid> wrote: > > Do we have some download stats (not a poll) - maybe on sdkman or some jdk > > vendors side? > > Dear Maven team, > > Would it help you to make the decision if you have usage statistics of JDK > 17 among IntelliJ IDEA Maven users? > > -- > Nikita Skvortsov > Software Developer > JetBrains > http://www.jetbrains.com > The Drive to Develop > > > ср, 31 мая 2023 г. в 11:43, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Do we have some download stats (not a poll) - maybe on sdkman or some jdk > > vendors side? > > Recently I saw (with customers I'm working on) the java 17 adoption being > > quite large and since people stucked to 3.9 will be covered for java 8 I > > think it could be sane to switch *master* if we can validate with actual > > figures (with little bias) that java 17 is >= 50% (being said the forward > > way is it will only increase). > > > > Side note: I'm not sure toolchain workaround is of any help there since > the > > main case will likely stay "use the contextual one and I don't have > others > > to offer you". > > > > So overall, if we can find some convergence that java 17 is getting > widely > > adopted I would be to switch now fo rmaven 4 without any toolchain hack. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 31 mai 2023 à 11:21, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> a > écrit > > : > > > > > > I think with those improvements, requiring JDK 17 for master should > be > > > > doable. Any concerns of suggestions ? > > > > > > I am against this. There are enough people who cannot move to Java 17 > for > > > a plethora of reasons regardless of Toolchains support. We provide a > low > > > level tool and it should have a low barrier to use. Maven 4 should be > > used > > > as a transitional version to 5 to cut old ties and solve many issues -- > > > even if we are in alpha phase now. > > > I bet many people will stick for 3.9.x or even 3.8.x for the years to > > come. > > > > > > M > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
