These are JDKs used as "Module JDK". These are JDKs that compile the source code or run the tests (as the default option). Regardless of the language level setting.
So the first line reads like this: "Among IntelliJ Ultimate users with Maven projects, 49.1% have at least one module that is compiled using JDK8" -- Nikita Skvortsov Software Developer JetBrains http://www.jetbrains.com The Drive to Develop ср, 31 мая 2023 г. в 16:03, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>: > Thank you! > But I have a problem understanding this info.... > AFAIK, IDEA embeds Java "that runs on". > So what is this, targeted platforms? (like maven.compiler.release?) > Or JDKs registered in IDE used for projects? > > Thanks > T > > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 4:00 PM Nikita Skvortsov > <nikita.skvort...@jetbrains.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > sure, it would be nice to see those numbers... :) > > > > Here we go. > > The numbers below are for users who have Maven projects. > > Please note that the same user can report multiple JDKs, so numbers do > not > > add up to 100. > > > > For IntelliJ Ultimate, the Top 5 JDK versions are: > > 8 - 49.1% > > 17 - 37.4% > > 11 - 27.2% > > 20 - 10.5% > > 19 - 9.7% > > > > For IntelliJ Community, the Top 5 JDK versions are: > > 17 - 31.8% > > 8 - 31.8% > > 11 - 24.6% > > 20 - 20.1% > > 19 - 10.8% > > > > Let me know if you are interested in other data or have any other > questions > > about Maven integration in IntelliJ IDEA > > Best regards, > > -- > > Nikita Skvortsov > > Software Developer > > JetBrains > > http://www.jetbrains.com > > The Drive to Develop > > > > > > ср, 31 мая 2023 г. в 14:32, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>: > > > > > Howdy Nikita, > > > > > > sure, it would be nice to see those numbers... :) > > > > > > Thanks > > > Tamas > > > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 2:25 PM Nikita Skvortsov > > > <nikita.skvort...@jetbrains.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > Do we have some download stats (not a poll) - maybe on sdkman or > some > > > jdk > > > > > vendors side? > > > > > > > > Dear Maven team, > > > > > > > > Would it help you to make the decision if you have usage statistics > of > > > JDK > > > > 17 among IntelliJ IDEA Maven users? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Nikita Skvortsov > > > > Software Developer > > > > JetBrains > > > > http://www.jetbrains.com > > > > The Drive to Develop > > > > > > > > > > > > ср, 31 мая 2023 г. в 11:43, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > > > > Do we have some download stats (not a poll) - maybe on sdkman or > some > > > jdk > > > > > vendors side? > > > > > Recently I saw (with customers I'm working on) the java 17 adoption > > > being > > > > > quite large and since people stucked to 3.9 will be covered for > java > > 8 > > > I > > > > > think it could be sane to switch *master* if we can validate with > > > actual > > > > > figures (with little bias) that java 17 is >= 50% (being said the > > > forward > > > > > way is it will only increase). > > > > > > > > > > Side note: I'm not sure toolchain workaround is of any help there > > since > > > > the > > > > > main case will likely stay "use the contextual one and I don't have > > > > others > > > > > to offer you". > > > > > > > > > > So overall, if we can find some convergence that java 17 is getting > > > > widely > > > > > adopted I would be to switch now fo rmaven 4 without any toolchain > > > hack. > > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 31 mai 2023 à 11:21, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> > a > > > > écrit > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > I think with those improvements, requiring JDK 17 for master > > should > > > > be > > > > > > > doable. Any concerns of suggestions ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I am against this. There are enough people who cannot move to > Java > > 17 > > > > for > > > > > > a plethora of reasons regardless of Toolchains support. We > provide > > a > > > > low > > > > > > level tool and it should have a low barrier to use. Maven 4 > should > > be > > > > > used > > > > > > as a transitional version to 5 to cut old ties and solve many > > issues > > > -- > > > > > > even if we are in alpha phase now. > > > > > > I bet many people will stick for 3.9.x or even 3.8.x for the > years > > to > > > > > come. > > > > > > > > > > > > M > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
