Thank you! But I have a problem understanding this info.... AFAIK, IDEA embeds Java "that runs on". So what is this, targeted platforms? (like maven.compiler.release?) Or JDKs registered in IDE used for projects?
Thanks T On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 4:00 PM Nikita Skvortsov <nikita.skvort...@jetbrains.com.invalid> wrote: > > sure, it would be nice to see those numbers... :) > > Here we go. > The numbers below are for users who have Maven projects. > Please note that the same user can report multiple JDKs, so numbers do not > add up to 100. > > For IntelliJ Ultimate, the Top 5 JDK versions are: > 8 - 49.1% > 17 - 37.4% > 11 - 27.2% > 20 - 10.5% > 19 - 9.7% > > For IntelliJ Community, the Top 5 JDK versions are: > 17 - 31.8% > 8 - 31.8% > 11 - 24.6% > 20 - 20.1% > 19 - 10.8% > > Let me know if you are interested in other data or have any other questions > about Maven integration in IntelliJ IDEA > Best regards, > -- > Nikita Skvortsov > Software Developer > JetBrains > http://www.jetbrains.com > The Drive to Develop > > > ср, 31 мая 2023 г. в 14:32, Tamás Cservenák <ta...@cservenak.net>: > > > Howdy Nikita, > > > > sure, it would be nice to see those numbers... :) > > > > Thanks > > Tamas > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 2:25 PM Nikita Skvortsov > > <nikita.skvort...@jetbrains.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > Do we have some download stats (not a poll) - maybe on sdkman or some > > jdk > > > > vendors side? > > > > > > Dear Maven team, > > > > > > Would it help you to make the decision if you have usage statistics of > > JDK > > > 17 among IntelliJ IDEA Maven users? > > > > > > -- > > > Nikita Skvortsov > > > Software Developer > > > JetBrains > > > http://www.jetbrains.com > > > The Drive to Develop > > > > > > > > > ср, 31 мая 2023 г. в 11:43, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > > > Do we have some download stats (not a poll) - maybe on sdkman or some > > jdk > > > > vendors side? > > > > Recently I saw (with customers I'm working on) the java 17 adoption > > being > > > > quite large and since people stucked to 3.9 will be covered for java > 8 > > I > > > > think it could be sane to switch *master* if we can validate with > > actual > > > > figures (with little bias) that java 17 is >= 50% (being said the > > forward > > > > way is it will only increase). > > > > > > > > Side note: I'm not sure toolchain workaround is of any help there > since > > > the > > > > main case will likely stay "use the contextual one and I don't have > > > others > > > > to offer you". > > > > > > > > So overall, if we can find some convergence that java 17 is getting > > > widely > > > > adopted I would be to switch now fo rmaven 4 without any toolchain > > hack. > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 31 mai 2023 à 11:21, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org> a > > > écrit > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > I think with those improvements, requiring JDK 17 for master > should > > > be > > > > > > doable. Any concerns of suggestions ? > > > > > > > > > > I am against this. There are enough people who cannot move to Java > 17 > > > for > > > > > a plethora of reasons regardless of Toolchains support. We provide > a > > > low > > > > > level tool and it should have a low barrier to use. Maven 4 should > be > > > > used > > > > > as a transitional version to 5 to cut old ties and solve many > issues > > -- > > > > > even if we are in alpha phase now. > > > > > I bet many people will stick for 3.9.x or even 3.8.x for the years > to > > > > come. > > > > > > > > > > M > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
