Actually I was going to have a shot at creating a patch for this, but when I checked the CVS, I got lost with the fact that the code appears to be generated and I havent found time yet to figure out exactly how :-)
-Corey On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 23:09:06 +1100, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This has been discussed several times in the past. I must say, scope is > probably the best name I've seen for it so far. > > It will get resolved in some way in the near future. > > - Brett > > > > Corey Scott wrote: > > >While we are on the subject of adding tags to <dependancy> has a scope > >tag been considered? This would allow users to generate dep reports > >and so on that lead to a better understanding of where and why the > >dependancy exists. > > > >Examples: > >Runtime (default) <scope>runtime</scope> > >Test Only <scope>test</scope> > >Build Only <scope>build</scope> > >Dependancy of a Dependancy <scope>??</scope> > > > >I believe that this has been hinted at during previous discussions and > >bug reports and i think it is has merit. > > > >Comments? > > > >-Corey > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
