I prefer it too (essentially for the 1st reason). I hope that m3 (if there's one) will not be incompatible with m2 projects !! ;-)
Arnaud Note : mvn are on the same row on an azerty keyboard :-) > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : samedi 15 octobre 2005 14:25 > À : Maven Developers List > Objet : Re: m2.. or mvn? > > Mark, > > I like it! I'd been thinking about this and resolved not to > change it, but we could certainly have both. > > What do others think? > > - Brett > > Mark Hobson wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >Now I'm sure this is a programming faux pas (and also badly > timed being > >so near to 2.0 final) but I've been pondering this since the > >alpha1 days - what do people think of renaming the m2 executable to > >mvn? The reasoning being: > > > >* m2 does differentiate from the m1 maven executable, but > what happens > >when m2.1 and m3 come out - do we keep changing the cmdline? > > > >* mvn still allows maven1 and maven2 to co-exist > side-by-side, but is > >also future-proof > > > >* mvn is a handy TLA like svn, cvs or ant and other tools > people type > >many times a day > > > >* the keys 'm', 'v' and 'n' are conveniently located almost > >side-by-side on the same row > > > >* mvn is simply maven with the vowels dropped > > > >What do people think? I realise this is hardly a blocker > but it's good > >to get off my chest! > > > >Cheers, > > > >Mark > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional > >commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
