Yes, I can add the override model option in; I'm fairly busy presently, but I can hopefully have something out in the next day or two.
Patrick On 3/12/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11 Mar 07, at 4:02 PM 11 Mar 07, Ralph Goers wrote: > Jason, > > Well, I view the behavior of the patch as being correct, but since > the override flag has been removed from the pom it breaks backward > compatibility with previous 2.0 verisons - which is why I added the > flag in the first place. > > However, if anyone complains about this it should be pointed out > that the prior behavior was very unpredictable. > I think as we discussed it should have the current behavior, even if it is highly erratic, and have it be consciously turned on. Who knows who is relying on the quirks. Patrick, can we put the option in the model to turn this features on please? Jason. > Ralph > > Jason van Zyl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've got three issues left to close out for 2.0.6 and two of them >> I will finish tomorrow and the snapshot weirdness I will fix wed/ >> thurs. But if anyone wants to try what's there so far it's here: >> >> http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ >> >> I imagine the MNG-1577 might spark some discussion and require >> changes but I'm shooting for a vote this wed/thurs as soon as I >> resolve the snapshot issues. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason. >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
