On 10 Sep 07, at 9:11 AM 10 Sep 07, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On 9/10/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We definitely want to control how snippets are pulled in and used. I
wouldn't turn on general XML includes as we'll end up with the mess
we had in Maven 1.x.
I must admit, that I can't follow you here. What to you mean by "the
mess we had in Maven 1.x"? Note, that the situation is quite different
here, because the inclusions result would still produce a POM with
exactly the same structure than we have now.
Do you believe, that implementing a different inclusion mechanism (for
example "plugin pack") for every suitable situation,
I don't believe a plugin pack is useful at all, I'm all for using
standard POM elements and a simple import , but we might want to
limit where imports can be used for example.
including more
complex semantics, is better?
I didn't say, or imply that at all.
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
