On 21-May-08, at 9:23 PM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It's not very complicated what we discussed. Essentially it's
artifactId =
symbolic bundle id because you'll never be able to derive the
artifactId/groupId pair from a symbolic bundle id because you don't
know
where to split it. So avoid the complication of the mapping. The
groupId
would be use for organization in the repository but not important
in the
creation of the symbolic bundle id. What this means is that you could
directly retrieve a bundle into a running osgi container without
trying to
synthesize the bundle id which is a good thing.
Next question then,
when can we seed a maven repository with bundles?
Officially? When we agree. This was a casual discussion we had at
EclipseCon. Probably wouldn't take long. I imagine most issues could
be hashed out in a week and then we could try it in a test repository
on central.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
believe nothing, no matter where you read it,
or who has said it,
not even if i have said it,
unless it agrees with your own reason
and your own common sense.
-- Buddha
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
