With the
<groupId>org.eclipse.equinox</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.equinox.app</artifactId>
example, it seems like the conventional configuration would become
<groupId>someGroupId</groupId>
<artifactId>${project.groupId}.someArtifactId</artifactId>.
Is that correct?
What should something like SWT look like?
<groupId>org.eclipse.swt</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.swt</artifactId>
[1]
or
<groupId>org.eclipse</groupId>
<artifactId>swt</artifactId>
[2]
or
<groupId>org.eclipse</groupId>
<artifactId>org.eclipse.swt</artifactId>
?
Relocation poms would be very helpful if any coordinates change during this
process. As it is now, I have a lot of exclusion filters for my transitive
mixed-coordinate eclipse dependencies.
Thanks,
Luke
[1] - versions 3.2.0 and 3.2.1 @ http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/
[2] - versions 3.3.0-v3339b, 3.3.0-v3345b and 3.3.0-v3346
@http://repo1.maven.org/eclipse/, versions 3.2.1-v3235e and 3.3.0-v3346
@http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/What-is-the-official-Eclipse-repo-layout-%28was%3A-How-to-use-central-repo-into-an-Eclipse-project-%29-tp17396298p18784119.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
