It would probably be a good idea to reorder the fields in the maven.mdo
file inside the maven-model project, to reflect the preferred style.
This should have the effect of reordering the generated reference
documentation and will also affect the ordering achieved when a POM is
written programmatically using the xpp3 writer (I think).
-john
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Vincent Siveton schrieb:
I propose to improve [1] to add a code style for our pom files.
+1 for some convention (which is documented as such).
I see the following in this order.
Considering other POMs like parent POMs and Mojo, your proposal should
finally cover all POM elements (e.g. <packaging>, <url>, <licenses>,
<developers> etc.).
Whatever we agree upon, we might want to update the Maven Model
Reference [0], too. I guess that was the ordering Dennis has chosen.
If not already written down, the indentation style (2 spaces) should
be mentioned, too.
<project>
...
</project>
I find your proposed ordering more intuitive than the current Model Ref.
Benjamin
[0] http://maven.apache.org/ref/current/maven-model/maven.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
John Casey
Developer, PMC Member - Apache Maven (http://maven.apache.org)
Blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/buildchimp/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
