Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Vincent Siveton schrieb:
I propose to improve [1] to add a code style for our pom files.
+1 for some convention (which is documented as such).
Yep, +1 for a POM code style
I see the following in this order.
Considering other POMs like parent POMs and Mojo, your proposal should
finally cover all POM elements (e.g. <packaging>, <url>, <licenses>,
<developers> etc.).
Whatever we agree upon, we might want to update the Maven Model
Reference [0], too. I guess that was the ordering Dennis has chosen.
I've always followed the ordering that is in the Model Reference.
I don't have a special preference for which order the elements should be
in and I'm happy with what we have now. If we change the order of the
elements in the POM, then there will be a lot of POMs to change. So I
say we apply the path of least resistance and just document that our
"style" is that POM elements should be ordered according to the order
they have in the POM reference and be done with it.
If not already written down, the indentation style (2 spaces) should be
mentioned, too.
+1 for that too
Additional things we could add:
- Line breaks, when to use them and how
- <project> element always on one line
- white space between sections/elements
<project>
...
</project>
I find your proposed ordering more intuitive than the current Model Ref.
Benjamin
[0] http://maven.apache.org/ref/current/maven-model/maven.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
