Jason, I apologize for misspeaking. I meant what Brian said: the
"affected" version should stay the same. It's okay to remove the "Fix"
for version which was altered to 2.2.1

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Brett Porter<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 02/07/2009, at 4:06 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
>> On 1-Jul-09, at 10:52 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>>
>>> It's logical to believe that 2.1 and 2.2 contain almost all the
>>> unresolved bugs of 2.0.x. Since 2.0.x is no longer being supported,
>>> there's no good reason to keep them attached to that version. You only
>>> want to backport the issues that will get fixing -- not potential
>>> fixes UNLESS the issue is exclusively a 2.0.x issue.
>>>
>>
>> Unfortunately this may not be the case because the code bases are now
>> pretty different. My only concern is that the 2.0.x line becomes the ugly
>> stepchild meanwhile this is where the vast majority of our users live.
>
> Ok, even so - I think there was some agreement that we wouldn't explicitly
> plan for a 2.0.12+ release, which was the motivation for the change I made.
> If, in the process of fixing an issue, the committer decides it really
> should be backported to 2.0.x that's still a possibility (or if someone else
> comes along and requests it).
>
> But I get the feeling that those sticking to 2.0.x are "happy" - in that
> they've got things working the way they want and probably won't jump up to
> further 2.0.x releases, let along 2.2.x. If we put out a 2.0.11 release and
> say "this is the last, barring critical issues - start looking at 2.2",
> we'll fairly soon hear about it if that's not what users want.
>
> At the same time, if we do start pushing fixes into 2.2.x, that gives more
> people incentive to try it, and help us identify if there are further
> barriers to moving across, in addition to continuing to build out more
> integration test cases that benefit us across the board.
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to