OK, I follow the logic now. On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Connolly <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought about that, but I suspect that we are at least 1 week away from > being ready to cut 3.1.0 anyway, so 1 week seems safest and gives potential > volunteers time to chime in. If Jason thinks he will be ready to cut 3.1.0 > in 4 days time, then I would consider 4 days... > > > On 26 February 2013 14:16, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think that a week is quite generous. I'd cut it down to 4 days. In >> any case, I support the general scheme here. >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Stephen Connolly >> <stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I would propose that we give until this time next week for somebody to >> > stand up and state that they feel the isolation is necessary and that >> they >> > are prepared to do the work to implement the isolation. >> > >> > If there is at least one person committing themselves, then we should >> > discuss the timetable they see for the implementation of isolation, and >> > make a judgement call on the basis of that discussion. >> > >> > If there is nobody feeling strongly about isolation, then at that point I >> > think it is safe to proceed with cutting 3.1.0 (assuming it is ready at >> > that point, or if not ready by then, finish the remaining tasks) >> > >> > Until/unless somebody steps up, I would think it is safe to proceed on >> the >> > basis that the release will be cut as soon as it is ready and the week >> has >> > expired. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > -Stephen >> > >> > >> > >> > On 26 February 2013 14:05, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote: >> > >> >> As I posted previously I would like to do the 3.1.0 release but I don't >> >> want to do the work of isolating SLF4J until it's shown that it will be >> a >> >> problem. I don't the believe the adoption of 3.1.0 is going to be so >> quick >> >> that we can't create a fix if necessary. I would rather do the release >> in a >> >> lean style and not do work for theoretical problems. >> >> >> >> In full disclosure I have a release of Tesla I want to make and I >> already >> >> have JSR330, SLF4J/Logback, and Eclipse Aether integrated so I would >> like >> >> to try and help get the JSR330, SLF4J out the door and then get Eclipse >> >> Aether integrated. >> >> >> >> If anyone feels strongly about trying to create the SLF4J isolation and >> is >> >> going to start the work to do it shortly there's no harm in waiting. >> But I >> >> would prefer to start getting the 3.1.0 release out the door, get some >> >> feedback and adjust if necessary. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Jason >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Jason van Zyl >> >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype >> >> Founder, Apache Maven >> >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
