With a bit of a notice (don't care if it's one week or 4 days or….), I certainly support this path. We need to talking about it and get 3.1 out.
Dan On Feb 26, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote: > As I posted previously I would like to do the 3.1.0 release but I don't want > to do the work of isolating SLF4J until it's shown that it will be a problem. > I don't the believe the adoption of 3.1.0 is going to be so quick that we > can't create a fix if necessary. I would rather do the release in a lean > style and not do work for theoretical problems. > > In full disclosure I have a release of Tesla I want to make and I already > have JSR330, SLF4J/Logback, and Eclipse Aether integrated so I would like to > try and help get the JSR330, SLF4J out the door and then get Eclipse Aether > integrated. > > If anyone feels strongly about trying to create the SLF4J isolation and is > going to start the work to do it shortly there's no harm in waiting. But I > would prefer to start getting the 3.1.0 release out the door, get some > feedback and adjust if necessary. > > Thanks, > > Jason > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Jason van Zyl > Founder & CTO, Sonatype > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Simplex sigillum veri. (Simplicity is the seal of truth.) > > > > > -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
