-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26229/#review55582
-----------------------------------------------------------



3rdparty/libprocess/src/reap.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/26229/#comment95943>

    Why do you need a variable for this? Can't this just be a 'return' 
statement?
    
    If there's a reason to keep this statement separate from the return, please 
avoid 'auto', we'd like to start using it very conservatively.


- Ben Mahler


On Oct. 6, 2014, 1:14 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/26229/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 6, 2014, 1:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Ben Mahler, Ian Downes, Jie Yu, 
> and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Lower and upper bounds for the poll interval are refactored as static 
> functions visible to outer world.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/include/process/reap.hpp 9de5336 
>   3rdparty/libprocess/src/reap.cpp ac14a86 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/26229/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check (Mac OS 10.9.4, Ubuntu 14.04)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to