It seems like this may become unnecessary as I fix MESOS-2232. Could you
hold off on this one?

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Benjamin Mahler <benjamin.mah...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> That review doesn't describe what the issue was, unfortunately. And the
> ticket is a bit vague.
>
> Is it about uninteresting mock calls? Do we want to change our mocking
> approach to avoid the uninteresting mock calls? Note that most of our other
> mocks do not have uninteresting calls because we used EXPECT_CALL instead
> of ON_CALL:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/0.21.1/src/tests/containerizer.cpp#L220
>
> The only mock that still uses ON_CALL is the allocator mock, IIRC:
>
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/0.21.1/src/tests/mesos.hpp#L654
>
> I can't recall if there was a reason for this, but it would be nice to end
> the madness. Hope this helps.
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Alexander Rukletsov <a...@mesosphere.io>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan. 15, 2015, 8:12 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
>> > > Yikes, could you elaborate on what the issue was?
>>
>> Based on this commit: b4bd08693f394a196e0310955b1afdfbe3c2de36,
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/24418
>>
>>
>> - Alexander
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> https://reviews.apache.org/r/29927/#review68310
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> On Jan. 15, 2015, 4:58 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
>> >
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------
>> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> > https://reviews.apache.org/r/29927/
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > (Updated Jan. 15, 2015, 4:58 p.m.)
>> >
>> >
>> > Review request for mesos, Bernd Mathiske and Niklas Nielsen.
>> >
>> >
>> > Bugs: MESOS-2213
>> >     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2213
>> >
>> >
>> > Repository: mesos-git
>> >
>> >
>> > Description
>> > -------
>> >
>> > Several tests have been reported flaky if allocator is not stopped
>> explicitly in some cases. Since allocators are not tied to the
>> AllocatorProcess any more, provide a method in Allocator to cease
>> allocation.
>> >
>> >
>> > Diffs
>> > -----
>> >
>> >   src/allocation/allocator.hpp PRE-CREATION
>> >   src/tests/master_allocator_tests.cpp 2430622
>> >   src/tests/mesos.hpp 591134b
>> >
>> > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29927/diff/
>> >
>> >
>> > Testing
>> > -------
>> >
>> > make check (Ubuntu, OS X)
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Alexander Rukletsov
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to