Is this a project for doing transfer through HTTP using Mina? If so it could be very valuable (to me anyways) :-D
On 8/27/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been moving things around, creating the 3 separate subprojects. > Everything is compiling and seems to be in good shape. I posted a question > to the list a couple days ago about javadocs at the class level and have not > heard back. Maybe your email and mine will bump this thread and someone can > answer my question. > > Either way, I will check in what I have tonight. I'm on EST.... > > -- > ..Cheers > Mark > > On 8/27/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any status on where we are at with this? I have patches I want to start > > delivering ;-) > > > > Jeff > > > > Mike Heath wrote: > > > I don't want to hold up moving this code over. If/when we decide to put > > > it on a different release schedule, moving the module over to a > > > 'commons' repo or something similar will be trivial. So, for the time > > > being, I would be fine if we moved asynchronous http client into MINA as > > > a module. > > > > > > I'm eager to play with this client and I'm very eager to look into using > > > it to create asynchronous web service calls. > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > Mark wrote: > > >> I like Trustin's three module ideas as well. I also think Mike has a > > >> valid > > >> concern on the release schedule. I would rather get a consensus on > > this > > >> before we move forward. > > >> > > >> > > >> On 8/23/07, Cameron Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> I liked Trustin's three module idea: > > >>> > > >>> * mina-filter-codec-http <-- common code > > >>> * mina-protocol-server-http <-- asyncweb imported here > > >>> * mina-protocol-client-http <-- AsyncHttpClient imported here > > >>> > > >>> Can it be decided later, after the import, whether it should be on > > >>> the same release cycle as MINA!? Apache Felix has components such as > > >>> their "commons" on a different release schedule. I think MINA could > > >>> do the same if needed. The most important thing I think is to get the > > >>> code imported right now. > > >>> > > >>> Cameron > > >>> > > >>> On 8/23/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>> based on Mike's comments, I am not sure where we want to go with all > > >>> this. > > >>>> On 8/22/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>> Mike and Mark, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I did my final commits. Feel free to grab the code. I will hold on > > >>>>> further development until it hits the Mina repo. You can find it > > all > > >>>>> here: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/AsyncHttpClient/ > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Jeff > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Mike Heath wrote: > > >>>>>> Trustin Lee wrote: > > >>>>>>> We might be able to extract common codec from both server and > > >>> client > > >>>>>>> side into a separate module and let two depend on it, resulting > > >>> three > > >>>>>>> submodules in total: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> * mina-filter-codec-http > > >>>>>>> * mina-protocol-server-http > > >>>>>>> * mina-protocol-client-http > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> wdty? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Trustin > > >>>>>> Are you suggesting making the above sub-modules part of MINA > > >>> itself? I > > >>>>>> don't like this idea as stated in my previous messages. I don't > > >>> like > > >>>>>> tying the release of MINA to the release of HTTP protocol handlers > > >>> and > > >>>>>> vice versa. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I very much like the idea of extracting common functionality > > between > > >>> an > > >>>>>> HTTP server and HTTP client and having both the client and server > > >>> depend > > >>>>>> on the common module. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> After giving it a lot of thought, I'm of the opinion more now than > > >>> ever > > >>>>>> that we should make async-httpclient part of AsyncWeb. They have > > >>> too > > >>>>>> much in common to keep them separate IMO. There's no reason that > > >>>>>> AsyncWeb should be a server only project and IIRC, there were plans > > >>> made > > >>>>>> a while ago to create a client for AsyncWeb. Such a move would > > also > > >>>>>> give us a good incentive to finally get AsyncWeb migrated over to > > >>> MINA. > > >>>>>> WDYT? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -Mike > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> ..Cheers > > >>>> Mark > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
