I liked Trustin's three module idea: * mina-filter-codec-http <-- common code * mina-protocol-server-http <-- asyncweb imported here * mina-protocol-client-http <-- AsyncHttpClient imported here
Can it be decided later, after the import, whether it should be on the same release cycle as MINA!? Apache Felix has components such as their "commons" on a different release schedule. I think MINA could do the same if needed. The most important thing I think is to get the code imported right now. Cameron On 8/23/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > based on Mike's comments, I am not sure where we want to go with all this. > > On 8/22/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Mike and Mark, > > > > I did my final commits. Feel free to grab the code. I will hold on > > further development until it hits the Mina repo. You can find it all > > here: > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/AsyncHttpClient/ > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jeff > > > > Mike Heath wrote: > > > Trustin Lee wrote: > > >> We might be able to extract common codec from both server and client > > >> side into a separate module and let two depend on it, resulting three > > >> submodules in total: > > >> > > >> * mina-filter-codec-http > > >> * mina-protocol-server-http > > >> * mina-protocol-client-http > > >> > > >> wdty? > > >> > > >> Trustin > > > > > > Are you suggesting making the above sub-modules part of MINA itself? I > > > don't like this idea as stated in my previous messages. I don't like > > > tying the release of MINA to the release of HTTP protocol handlers and > > > vice versa. > > > > > > I very much like the idea of extracting common functionality between an > > > HTTP server and HTTP client and having both the client and server depend > > > on the common module. > > > > > > After giving it a lot of thought, I'm of the opinion more now than ever > > > that we should make async-httpclient part of AsyncWeb. They have too > > > much in common to keep them separate IMO. There's no reason that > > > AsyncWeb should be a server only project and IIRC, there were plans made > > > a while ago to create a client for AsyncWeb. Such a move would also > > > give us a good incentive to finally get AsyncWeb migrated over to MINA. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > -- > ..Cheers > Mark >
