I like Trustin's three module ideas as well. I also think Mike has a valid concern on the release schedule. I would rather get a consensus on this before we move forward.
On 8/23/07, Cameron Taggart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I liked Trustin's three module idea: > > * mina-filter-codec-http <-- common code > * mina-protocol-server-http <-- asyncweb imported here > * mina-protocol-client-http <-- AsyncHttpClient imported here > > Can it be decided later, after the import, whether it should be on > the same release cycle as MINA!? Apache Felix has components such as > their "commons" on a different release schedule. I think MINA could > do the same if needed. The most important thing I think is to get the > code imported right now. > > Cameron > > On 8/23/07, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > based on Mike's comments, I am not sure where we want to go with all > this. > > > > On 8/22/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Mike and Mark, > > > > > > I did my final commits. Feel free to grab the code. I will hold on > > > further development until it hits the Mina repo. You can find it all > > > here: > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/AsyncHttpClient/ > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > Mike Heath wrote: > > > > Trustin Lee wrote: > > > >> We might be able to extract common codec from both server and > client > > > >> side into a separate module and let two depend on it, resulting > three > > > >> submodules in total: > > > >> > > > >> * mina-filter-codec-http > > > >> * mina-protocol-server-http > > > >> * mina-protocol-client-http > > > >> > > > >> wdty? > > > >> > > > >> Trustin > > > > > > > > Are you suggesting making the above sub-modules part of MINA > itself? I > > > > don't like this idea as stated in my previous messages. I don't > like > > > > tying the release of MINA to the release of HTTP protocol handlers > and > > > > vice versa. > > > > > > > > I very much like the idea of extracting common functionality between > an > > > > HTTP server and HTTP client and having both the client and server > depend > > > > on the common module. > > > > > > > > After giving it a lot of thought, I'm of the opinion more now than > ever > > > > that we should make async-httpclient part of AsyncWeb. They have > too > > > > much in common to keep them separate IMO. There's no reason that > > > > AsyncWeb should be a server only project and IIRC, there were plans > made > > > > a while ago to create a client for AsyncWeb. Such a move would also > > > > give us a good incentive to finally get AsyncWeb migrated over to > MINA. > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > ..Cheers > > Mark > > > -- ..Cheers Mark
