Sounds good to me thanks Trustin. Alex
On Jan 21, 2008 2:47 PM, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex, > > Dave is already a PMC member. We could invite Dan and Timothy. > Should the invitation as easy as modification of the authorization > file and sending a message to the board, because we forgot to invite > them to the PMC when we import AsyncWeb? > > PS: Of course we need to add them to the committer if they are not, > although I guess all they are already. > > Trustin > > On Jan 22, 2008 4:36 AM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually I think as with FTPServer the people on the Asyncweb project > should > > also be on the PMC to have binding votes. Or else they cannot vote to > > release etc. > > > > Alex > > > > > > On Jan 21, 2008 2:33 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Timothy ! > > > > > > > Timothy Bennett wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jan 21, 2008 1:07 AM, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> And, I personally think providing the codecs for essential > protocols > > > >> such as HTTP, FTP and SMTP as a part of the main MINA distribution > > > >> makes a developer's life much easier when what he wants is just a > > > >> minimal client / server. That's what I've been talking in > ApacheCons > > > >> and you can see that clearly in my slide files, which were uploaded > in > > > >> the official site since 2005. It's interesting that nobody argued > > > >> about the road map I proposed since then. Actually we got some > > > >> positive feed back related with the HTTP codec from users due to > this > > > >> decision. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > That's all well and good, but I doubt anyone understood that the > method > > > > utilized would be to lobotomize and existing project in order to > grow > > > the > > > > core codecs. As an original and core committer of the AsyncWeb > project > > > over > > > > at Safehaus, when I was asked to give permission for the code to be > > > donated > > > > to the Apache Mina project, the impression was *not* that it was > going > > > to be > > > > gutted and absorbed into the Mina core. My impression was that > Mina > > > was > > > > going to host AsyncWeb until we gained enough momentum to enter the > > > > incubator of our own accord. In fact, the Directory-Mina model was > > > > specifically noted as an example. > > > > > > > I think this is still the way it should go. And as the project is > > > already in MINA, it won't be necessary to go through incubation to > > > become a TLP (or a subproject). > > > > I'm not arguing that Mina doesn't need a HTTP codec in its core, but > I > > > > certainly don't agree that codec should be an absorption of the > AsyncWeb > > > > codebase. I believe the AsyncWeb project has a lot of potential as > a > > > > separate project on its own, and I've very exciting that it is > finally > > > in > > > > ASF where we can start to build a thriving community around it. > > > > > > > The clock is ticking ;) Let's build this community now ! > > > > I know my vote doesn't count for anything in the Mina project, > > > Not true. Even if there are some binding votes and some unbinding > votes, > > > what is important is what people are bringing on the table, much more > > > that the vote. So your vote is important to us. > > > > > > Remember that we try to reach concensus, and we often succeed in doing > > > so. In this case, your -1 is not just a lonely shout in the outer > space ;) > > > > > > Thanks a lot for AsyncWeb, btw ! > > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > cordialement, regards, > > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > > www.iktek.com > > > directory.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > -- > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6 >
