On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]>wrote:

> Sangjin Lee wrote:
>
>> The versions are definitely messy, and we need to sort it out.
>> How about calling the trunk the "2.0" version as it is based on mina 2.0.x
>> (easier to remember)?  Let's keep the 1.0 version as is.  But let's name
>> it
>> "1.0-mina1".
>>
>>
> The trunk will contain the 2.0 version. The name will remain trunk, though.
> We will have to change the pom.xml to reflect this modification, once the
> 1.0-mina1 branch will be created. (note that the mina1 suffix is just used
> as a reminder)


I agree.  That's what I meant too. :)


>
>  As for subprojects,
>> the 1.0 client does not have separate common, client, and server
>> projects.  That is only in the trunk pom.xml.  And this actually goes
>> to the heart of this point.  The common-client-server division is based on
>> the vision that both the client and server share a significant portion of
>> code.
>>
>> As it stands right now,
>> the 1.0 branch has only the client portion, and there is no breakout
>> of the common piece.  If possible, I'd like to keep it that way...
>>
>>
> we can, but as the client depends on the current trunk, as soon as we do
> some modifciation in trunk, the branch will be dead.


Where do you see the (1.0 branch) client dependency on the asyncweb trunk?
 I'm looking at the pom.xml (
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client/pom.xml?revision=682452&content-type=text%2Fplain)
but I don't see a dependency on the asyncweb trunk (only mina 1.1.x and
other libraries).  Maybe I'm being thick...


>
>
> I suggest we go a bit further and copy all what we have in trunk in the 1.0
> branch.
>
> Now, we should create 3 sub projects in this branch, one for client (what
> you want to work on), the server and commons. They will be separated
> projects.
>
> here is the structure I forsee :
>
> /
>  branches
>   1.0-mina1
>     client
>     commons
>     server
>     pom.xml
>     NOTICE
>     README
>  tags
>   <nothing atm, but hopefully 1.0 soon>
>  trunk
>   client
>   commons
>   server
>   pom.xml
>   NOTICE
>   README
>
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>

Reply via email to