[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17233766#comment-17233766
 ] 

Lyor Goldstein commented on SSHD-1091:
--------------------------------------

{quote}
Though I don't see the benefit of the current split.
{quote}
There is another benefit for the current split - handling key files, authorized 
keys, known hosts, raw ciphers/mac/compression etc. does not require any of the 
client/server specific code.

{quote}
I think we should  split between common / client / server
{quote}
Agree - actually, I believe the split should be:

* _sshd-common_ - same as current
* _sshd-core_ - classes that are shared by client and server- e.g., 
{{Session}}, {{Channel}}, {{FactoryManager}}, etc.
* _sshd-client_ - classes that are relevant only to the client - e.g., 
{{SshClient}}, {{ClientSession}}, {{ClientFactoryManager}}, etc.
* _sshd-server_ - classes that are relevant only to the server - e.g., 
{{SshServer}}, {{ServerSession}}, {{ServerFactoryManager}}, etc.

{quote}
if we're going for a 3.0 version, we should think on how to reduce the 
footprint a bit as the sshd-osgi
{quote}
Agree - if we go for 3.0, then we could do the split along the lines I 
suggested and disband _sshd-osgi_ altogether. In this context, perhaps we 
should even consider a more fine grained split based on "optional components" - 
e.g. client/server port forwarding as separate module than core client/server 
(Not quite figured out if this is feasible, but a thought...)

> Java Module support
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: SSHD-1091
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1091
>             Project: MINA SSHD
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.1
>            Reporter: Gili
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: important
>
> Please use the mechanism found at 
> https://github.com/apache/maven-compiler-plugin/blob/master/src/it/multirelease-patterns/singleproject-runtime/pom.xml#L102-L108
>  to build multirelease JAR that will provide module-info.java for users of 
> Java 9 and newer.
> The current JAR triggers many problems for users of Java Modules and in fact 
> cannot be used at all in its current state due to 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-436
> This might be a bug in the Maven Compiler plugin but I suspect that 
> ultimately it will a problem with the library itself. For example, I noticed 
> that Apache Mina (which this library depends on) has split packages. Split 
> packages are incompatible with Java Modules.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org

Reply via email to