Thanks Patrick. Updated roadmap and next release content. Patrick - suggest to send a reminder to review the design doc and collect feedback. Are there still known issues or gaps before we declare MKL-DNN integration as GA?
Regards, Steffen On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:31 AM Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> wrote: > Thanks, Steffen. > > Regarding the next release note, two items from our side: > > 1. (-remove) MKL-DNN integration is done. I think we can remove this item. > 2. (+add) MKL-DNN based graph optimization and quantization by subgraph > Design doc: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Graph+Optimization+and+Quantization+based+on+subgraph+and+MKL-DNN > Lead Contributor: Patric Zhao, https://github.com/pengzhao-intel/ > > Regarding the Roadmap > (+add) Q1 2019: MKL-DNN RNN API supports > > BR, > > Thanks, > > --Patric > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 11:31 AM > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release > > > > Sorry I meant to say next 'Regarding the *minor* release'. > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 5:27 AM kellen sunderland < > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks for transparently setting a rough timeline Steffen. I think > > > this will go a long way in helping the community plan their work, even > > > if the details change somewhat on the road to the release. > > > > > > Regarding the major release: I would propose we unify TensorRT with > > > the subgraph operator work. > > > > > > Regarding the patch release: There were a few minor stack/buffer > > > overflows exposed by ASAN that have been addressed. It's probably a > > > good idea to include them in a patch release, as they at best result > > > in non-deterministic behaviour. > > > > > > -Kellen > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:39 AM Steffen Rochel > > > <steffenroc...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> I updated > > >> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+f > > >> or+next+MXNet+Release > > >> , > > >> removed the completed items from 1.3 release and would like to kick > > >> off discussion about the next release. Please suggest what you would > > >> like to see included in the next release together with link to design > > >> proposal (appropriately for the size and complexity of the proposal) > > >> or suggest changes. > > >> I suggest to target the next release for December 2018 to frame the > > >> discussion. > > >> Lets include review of > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Roadmap - > > >> time to update and discuss changes. > > >> > > >> From the 1.3 release we had discussion regarding > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11849 and resolution > > >> in > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12412 . > > >> Are you aware of critical issues and feedback from user which we > > >> should consider for a potential 1.3.1 patch release. Should we > > >> include PR 12412 in a potential patch release? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Steffen > > >> > > > >
