I calling a lazy vote to release MXNet 1.3.1 (patch release) and 1.4.0 (minor relase).
Release content: release proposal page <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release> Target milestones: *1.3.1* - Code Freeze: 10/31 - Release published: 11/13 *1.4.0:* - Code Freeze: 11/13 - Release published: 12/13 (if possible announce during NIPS) The vote will be open until Wednesday October 31, 2018 8.00pm PDT. Regards, Steffen On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:56 AM Steffen Rochel <steffenroc...@gmail.com> wrote: > During the Hangout on Wednesday multiple release proposals have been > discussed. I summarized discussion here > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Hangout+October+24th+2018+8am+and+5pm+PDT> > and > updated the release proposal page > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+for+next+MXNet+Release> > . > Please review, provide feedback and propose changes. > I plan to start a lazy vote on Sunday regarding the release proposal. > > Calling for volunteers to manage the 1.3.1 and 1.4.0 release. > > Regards, > Steffen > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 7:20 AM kellen sunderland < > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey Steffen, >> >> Recommend these be merged into patch release: >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12631 >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12603 >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12499 >> >> -Kellen >> >> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:17 AM Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Thanks to let us know this discussion. >> > Because we don't have enough bandwidth to track the different sources, >> > like discussion forum. >> > >> > I think the best way is to open issue in the github so that we can >> > answer/solve the issue in time :) >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > --Patric >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Afrooze, Sina [mailto:sina....@gmail.com] >> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 1:14 AM >> > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org >> > > Cc: Ye, Jason Y <jason.y...@intel.com>; Zai, Alexander >> > > <alex...@amazon.com>; Zheng, Da <dzz...@amazon.com> >> > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release >> > > >> > > This post suggests there is a regression from 1.1.0 to 1.2.1 related >> to >> > > MKLDNN integration: >> https://discuss.mxnet.io/t/mxnet-1-2-1-module-get- >> > > outputs/1882 >> > > >> > > The error is related to MKLDNN layout not being converted back to >> MXNet >> > > layout in some operator: " !IsMKLDNNData() We can’t generate TBlob for >> > > MKLDNN data. Please use Reorder2Default() to generate a new NDArray >> > > first" >> > > >> > > Sina >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 9/30/18, 6:55 PM, "Steffen Rochel" <steffenroc...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Thanks Patrick. >> > > Updated roadmap and next release content. >> > > >> > > Patrick - suggest to send a reminder to review the design doc and >> > collect >> > > feedback. >> > > Are there still known issues or gaps before we declare MKL-DNN >> > > integration >> > > as GA? >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Steffen >> > > >> > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:31 AM Zhao, Patric < >> patric.z...@intel.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Thanks, Steffen. >> > > > >> > > > Regarding the next release note, two items from our side: >> > > > >> > > > 1. (-remove) MKL-DNN integration is done. I think we can remove >> > this >> > > item. >> > > > 2. (+add) MKL-DNN based graph optimization and quantization by >> > > subgraph >> > > > Design doc: >> > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Graph+Optimiz >> > > ation+and+Quantization+based+on+subgraph+and+MKL-DNN >> > > > Lead Contributor: Patric Zhao, >> > https://github.com/pengzhao-intel/ >> > > > >> > > > Regarding the Roadmap >> > > > (+add) Q1 2019: MKL-DNN RNN API supports >> > > > >> > > > BR, >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > >> > > > --Patric >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com] >> > > > > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 11:31 AM >> > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org >> > > > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release >> > > > > >> > > > > Sorry I meant to say next 'Regarding the *minor* release'. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 5:27 AM kellen sunderland < >> > > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks for transparently setting a rough timeline Steffen. >> I >> > think >> > > > > > this will go a long way in helping the community plan their >> > work, even >> > > > > > if the details change somewhat on the road to the release. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Regarding the major release: I would propose we unify >> TensorRT >> > with >> > > > > > the subgraph operator work. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Regarding the patch release: There were a few minor >> > stack/buffer >> > > > > > overflows exposed by ASAN that have been addressed. It's >> > probably >> > > a >> > > > > > good idea to include them in a patch release, as they at >> best >> > result >> > > > > > in non-deterministic behaviour. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -Kellen >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:39 AM Steffen Rochel >> > > > > > <steffenroc...@gmail.com> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> I updated >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+f >> > > > > >> or+next+MXNet+Release >> > > > > >> , >> > > > > >> removed the completed items from 1.3 release and would >> like to >> > > kick >> > > > > >> off discussion about the next release. Please suggest what >> you >> > > would >> > > > > >> like to see included in the next release together with link >> > to design >> > > > > >> proposal (appropriately for the size and complexity of the >> > proposal) >> > > > > >> or suggest changes. >> > > > > >> I suggest to target the next release for December 2018 to >> > frame the >> > > > > >> discussion. >> > > > > >> Lets include review of >> > > > > >> >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Roadmap - >> > > > > >> time to update and discuss changes. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> From the 1.3 release we had discussion regarding >> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11849 and >> > > resolution >> > > > > >> in >> > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12412 . >> > > > > >> Are you aware of critical issues and feedback from user >> which >> > we >> > > > > >> should consider for a potential 1.3.1 patch release. >> Should we >> > > > > >> include PR 12412 in a potential patch release? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Regards, >> > > > > >> Steffen >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >
