Hey Steffen, Recommend these be merged into patch release:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12631 https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12603 https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12499 -Kellen On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 7:17 AM Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> wrote: > Thanks to let us know this discussion. > Because we don't have enough bandwidth to track the different sources, > like discussion forum. > > I think the best way is to open issue in the github so that we can > answer/solve the issue in time :) > > Thanks, > > --Patric > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Afrooze, Sina [mailto:sina....@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 1:14 AM > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > > Cc: Ye, Jason Y <jason.y...@intel.com>; Zai, Alexander > > <alex...@amazon.com>; Zheng, Da <dzz...@amazon.com> > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release > > > > This post suggests there is a regression from 1.1.0 to 1.2.1 related to > > MKLDNN integration: https://discuss.mxnet.io/t/mxnet-1-2-1-module-get- > > outputs/1882 > > > > The error is related to MKLDNN layout not being converted back to MXNet > > layout in some operator: " !IsMKLDNNData() We can’t generate TBlob for > > MKLDNN data. Please use Reorder2Default() to generate a new NDArray > > first" > > > > Sina > > > > > > > > > > On 9/30/18, 6:55 PM, "Steffen Rochel" <steffenroc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks Patrick. > > Updated roadmap and next release content. > > > > Patrick - suggest to send a reminder to review the design doc and > collect > > feedback. > > Are there still known issues or gaps before we declare MKL-DNN > > integration > > as GA? > > > > Regards, > > Steffen > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:31 AM Zhao, Patric <patric.z...@intel.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks, Steffen. > > > > > > Regarding the next release note, two items from our side: > > > > > > 1. (-remove) MKL-DNN integration is done. I think we can remove > this > > item. > > > 2. (+add) MKL-DNN based graph optimization and quantization by > > subgraph > > > Design doc: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Graph+Optimiz > > ation+and+Quantization+based+on+subgraph+and+MKL-DNN > > > Lead Contributor: Patric Zhao, > https://github.com/pengzhao-intel/ > > > > > > Regarding the Roadmap > > > (+add) Q1 2019: MKL-DNN RNN API supports > > > > > > BR, > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > --Patric > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: kellen sunderland [mailto:kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com] > > > > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2018 11:31 AM > > > > To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Next MXNet release > > > > > > > > Sorry I meant to say next 'Regarding the *minor* release'. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 5:27 AM kellen sunderland < > > > > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for transparently setting a rough timeline Steffen. I > think > > > > > this will go a long way in helping the community plan their > work, even > > > > > if the details change somewhat on the road to the release. > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the major release: I would propose we unify TensorRT > with > > > > > the subgraph operator work. > > > > > > > > > > Regarding the patch release: There were a few minor > stack/buffer > > > > > overflows exposed by ASAN that have been addressed. It's > probably > > a > > > > > good idea to include them in a patch release, as they at best > result > > > > > in non-deterministic behaviour. > > > > > > > > > > -Kellen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:39 AM Steffen Rochel > > > > > <steffenroc...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> I updated > > > > >> > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Project+Proposals+f > > > > >> or+next+MXNet+Release > > > > >> , > > > > >> removed the completed items from 1.3 release and would like to > > kick > > > > >> off discussion about the next release. Please suggest what you > > would > > > > >> like to see included in the next release together with link > to design > > > > >> proposal (appropriately for the size and complexity of the > proposal) > > > > >> or suggest changes. > > > > >> I suggest to target the next release for December 2018 to > frame the > > > > >> discussion. > > > > >> Lets include review of > > > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+Roadmap - > > > > >> time to update and discuss changes. > > > > >> > > > > >> From the 1.3 release we had discussion regarding > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/11849 and > > resolution > > > > >> in > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/12412 . > > > > >> Are you aware of critical issues and feedback from user which > we > > > > >> should consider for a potential 1.3.1 patch release. Should we > > > > >> include PR 12412 in a potential patch release? > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> Steffen > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
