Hi, Here's the second update. At the moment we are only missing ICLAs from 20 (out of 70) contributors, accounting for 31 (out of 913) commits left.
3 @zhenlinluo 3 @jpauwels 3 @hjk41 3 @DrustZ 2 @zhangchen-qinyinghua 2 @yinghu5 2 @reyoung 1 @xinyu-intel 1 @xingmingjie 1 @qiaohaijun 1 @loveisp 1 @lebeg 1 @kaleidoscopical 1 @jason-xuan 1 @happynear 1 @glingyan 1 @asitstands 1 @antoine-wdg-rmz 1 @alextnewman 1 @Harmonicahappy Regarding whether the contributors are employed by a company that requires CCLA for contribution, I have no way of verifying the contributors' employment status at the time of contribution, and not enough bandwidth to verify the individual company policies on such contribution. As such, I will solely rely on the ICLAs. Given the current status, I think the rest of the 31 commits is manageable for me even if I end up having to revert and rework all of them. Let me know if you have any concern on starting the IP clearance process. Otherwise I think we can start it on general@incubator soon. Cheers, Sheng On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 8:59 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In the case of Intel and other companies, it may be that their employee > contracts do not allow employees to contribute to OS projects. It more > likely that the contributor doesn’t own copyright of the code but their > employer does. A CCLA give a clear indication that the contributors are > intact allowed to contrive code and own the copyright of their > contributions. We have CCLAs from Intel on file from other contributions so > it would seem that Intel requires this. > > Thanks, > Justin
