Justin, Are you OK with proceeding?
Regards, Sheng On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 8:30 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@cs.washington.edu> wrote: > As long as we have CLA covering for the majority of the code(which I > believe so), I think we should be good. > Just like the case of Apache only requires iCLA from committers. > > The rationale is that normal contributions are already in the form of ALv2, > in the case of a(unlikely) dispute, the community can quickly rewrite the > code(since that is non-majority). > > TQ > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 5:49 PM Sheng Zha <szha....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Justin, > > > > Thanks, that's a good point. I think we have already received CCLA from > > Intel. I will take that into account when providing the next update. > > > > Regards, > > Sheng > > > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 5:39 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Several peoples in below list are from Intel and I have added them > into > > > CC. > > > > > > Has Intel signed a CCLA? And if so does it list people who are allowed > to > > > contribute to this project? Are there any others on that list who > > > employer’s may need to also sign CCLAs if we don’t have them? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > >
