Hmm, sounds interesting, what exactly would you have in mind, something like a Callback for additional security checks which receives the viewId and then can check wheather or not access is allowed and return a boolean or so?
On 10/30/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ernst, you also wanna check some of the *extensions* in the MyFAcesNH_Impl for accessing navigation cases. It is important in security cases to *check* navigation cases ... so your impl could benefit from that ! On 10/29/06, Ernst Fastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right, an alternate NavigationHandler shipped with MyFaces > is probably the better choice let's go with that approach. > > thanks for your ideas > > On 10/29/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > 2) since in JSF 1.1 navigation outcomes are string it is completely possible > > > > for a programmer to have a syntax error in out comes > > > > > > Sorry don't get your point here, if an action returns a misspelled outcome > > > or a misspelled viewId you would not want to navigate in both cases right? > > > > I think he means the 404 error, ... > > > > > > However, I kinda like stuff like that, but not configurable! > > We had had enough fun with bogus features like dummyForm. > > > > We can provide a LazyNavigationHandlerImpl for that in Tomahawk and if > > sb. really really > > want that, use that particular NH. > > > > just my $0.02 > > > > -M > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh > > > > further stuff: > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
