On 10/31/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi! > 1.) Seperate NavigationHandlerImpl IMHO, this is a must! I think we should *not* implement stuff which "silently" changes/enhances the behaviour - especially in myfaces-impl!! The TCK might forbid this change anyway ...
+1 !
> 2.) Configurable Option not required, as everyone can configure this NH in faces-config.xml.
right! adding stuff to the web.xml for that is blech!
> 3.) Custom NH code in the wiki with a "discouraged" note This might be a good compromise.
like we do with the JBoss stuff ? I don't mind that
> > 4.) Not at all I do not mind ;-) 5) Add the new NH to the sandbox (but not configured by default) I like it to put stuff to the sandbox first and see if the community is willing to use them .... something like "the time will tell if its worth".
Yes, my understanding is that EVERY new Tomahawk stuff goes to Sandbox first. Components AND framework features. Go ahead Ernstl -M
Ciao, Mario
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
