No, Facelets license was changed to ASL specifically to make integration possible so we're actually integrating Facelets code directly but with different package names and/or class names, hence why I just added some info in NOTICE.txt specifying such usage as suggested on legal-discuss when I raised the question.
~ Simon On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Kito Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey Simon, > > Just curious: are you guys implementing Facelets from scratch? > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> We're reaching the point of integrating Facelets to the core 2.0 branch >> and we need to determine what kind of package structure we'll be using.My >> first thought would be to concentrate core Facelets classes in >> org.apache.myfaces.application.facelets and place the tag classes in >> org.apache.myfaces.taglib.facelets.core/html/* and move jsp specific tags >> from org.apache.myfaces.taglib.* to org.apache.myfaces.taglib.jsp.* >> >> Is there any better suggestion for this? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> ~ Simon >> > > > > -- > Kito D. Mann -- Author, JavaServer Faces in Action > http://twitter.com/kito99 > http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and mentoring > http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info > +1 203-404-4848 x3 > > > >
