Hi Jan-Kees, MyFaces has its own version of the javax.faces.8 within myfaces-api.jar file. That file obviously has the same content as Mojarra's, but with different code and thus a different bug/peformance base. However I must admit that most difference reside within the -impl
Regards, ~ Simon On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Jan-Kees van Andel < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > It might be a stupid question, but where does the MyFaces javax.faces > codebase come from? Is it copied straight from Mojarra? Or does this cause > licensing issues and must all files be created by hand, based on the spec? > > A.t.m., many of the new classes, like the pdl.facelets package are missing. > > If you guys want, I can start adding them to myfaces2 if it needs to be > done by hand. > > Regards, > Jan-Kees > > > > 2008/11/27 Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I don't think just dropping the code will be enough. There are some >> contract difference between Facelets and Facelets in JSF 2.0. Although >> they're mostly compatible, some interfaces were added (see pdl) and the >> createView contract was changed as well (forcing full tree population that >> doesn't seem to be the case in Facelets code atm). >> >> Furthermore, imho it's quite healthy to fork the code as it's going to >> start an improvement "competition" between Mojarra's Facelets and our >> Facelets, much like what happened when MyFaces was first implemented, much >> faster than RI at the time, forcing the latter to improve their own code and >> so on. >> >> That being said, if the community feels like we should limit the amount of >> changes as much as possible (to include Facelets updates and bug fixes every >> now and then for example), I could also abide to that. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> ~ Simon >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> Kito Mann schrieb: >>> >>>> Hey Simon, >>>> >>>> Just curious: are you guys implementing Facelets from scratch? >>>> >>>> I have not had a look yet at the current codebase, but to my knowledge >>> facelets itself has been relizenced under ASF2 >>> I would suggest just for the sake of keeping the compatibility close >>> no reimplementation just drag the code over, dont change the packages >>> if possible so that we at least there have a shared codebase. >>> It just does not make sense to do a full reimplementation or >>> to fork the code, since there are no political issues between the RI and >>> MyFaces, on the contrary we have an excellent relationship! >>> >>> >>> Werner >>> >>> >> >
