On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Bruno Aranda <brunoara...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It sounds like a good idea to me. Tomahawk has been always one of the > main reasons of people using MyFaces. I would say that having such a > sandbox can be the start or a much modern Tomahawk for the future.
+1 eventually we should pick a different name; main focus could be adding "easy components" (aka wrapper for fancy JS libraries) + other stuff (e.g. some 2.0 successors of Tomahawk) -M > > Cheers, > > Bruno > > 2009/5/27 Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>: >> Hi, >> >> sure MyFaces 2.0 is not yet there, but I want to share an idea... >> >> Since JSF 2.0 has the new Facelets support to easily create (custom) >> components, >> would it be a good idea to start a new (sandbox) project that defines >> a JSF 2.0 set >> of components, only written via the Facelets way ? >> >> I had to play with some fancy JS (jQuery) to make a "wow" *easy* >> component (via Facelets). >> I think it would be cool to have such a library that provides a kinda >> wrapper for some JS lib, >> e.g. jQuery. >> >> -Matthias >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
