I think the ExtJS has a GPL-style license, right ? On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Cagatay Civici <cagatay.civ...@gmail.com> wrote: > I had terrible experiences with dojo in the past, if you say flaws are > fixed, documentation is improved, then I'd be 0 instead of -1 :) Dojo is > like ejb2 to me. I'd consider ExtJS as well instead of dojo. Maybe it's a > better match of widgets compared to jquery ui. > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Cagatay, >> >> Can we try to find arguments in favour of possible javascript libraries? >> Why do you prefer jQuery? The tomahawk dependency is on dojo 0.4, current is >> 1.3.1, you just cannot compare them. jQuery plugins aren't part of the main >> jQuery project, so maintenance may be not guaranteed on the long term. For >> example the dojo dataGrid is still in dojox because it has minor issues, but >> it still is superior to all "stable" jQuery table plugins (e.g. flexgrid) >> I've seen. On the other hand the main jQuery project lacks basic widgets >> (combo/select, input, table, ...). Also dojo has a comprehesive validation >> concept over all its widgets which isn't possible with the widespread jQuery >> plugins. >> >> Best regards, >> Ganesh >> >> Cagatay Civici schrieb: >>> >>> Tomahawk already has dojo a huge dependency. >>> >>> For the new lib I'd favor using jquery UI plus stable jquery plugins >>> instead of dojo. >>> >>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org >>> <mailto:mat...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >>> not sure I read that article, but I agree that it is worth to go the >>> Facelets road, for new things. >>> Not sure if EVERY 2.0 library needs to contain only template-based >>> components; old-fashion >>> renderers are still, ok... >>> >>> so generally you also think it is worth to host something like that ? >>> I personally would like to start with this by introducing a >>> wrapper for >>> jQuery (included via JSF 2.0 resource handling) >>> >>> -M >>> >>> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org >>> <mailto:gan...@j4fry.org>> wrote: >>> > Hi Matthias, >>> > >>> > Funny you're asking this today: Last night I've released the J4Fry >>> > dojoFacelets library on sourceforge. It's a pure JSF >>> template/dojo library, >>> > it was build on JSF 1.1/1.2 w/Facelets and it runs on JSF 2.0 >>> out of the >>> > box. The templates are AJAX enabled via ui:define. The first >>> project based >>> > on the new components will be productive around juli in a >>> european bank. >>> > We've started working on this last autumn after I released this >>> artivle in >>> > german JavaMagazin, making the point that future JSF tag >>> libraries must be >>> > template based: >>> > >>> >>> http://www.j4fry.org/resources/jung_JSF_JavaMagazin_Tag_Entwicklung_mit_Facelets.pdf. >>> > The dojoFacelets are apache licensed and we would love to make >>> them a >>> > starting point for a new MyFaces subproject. >>> > >>> > Here's a link to the documentation: >>> http://j4fry.org/dojoFacelets.shtml >>> > (with links to examples and downloads - the JSF 2.0 example is >>> currently >>> > offline, check the JSF 1.2 example). >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > Ganesh >>> > >>> > Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> sure MyFaces 2.0 is not yet there, but I want to share an idea... >>> >> >>> >> Since JSF 2.0 has the new Facelets support to easily create >>> (custom) >>> >> components, >>> >> would it be a good idea to start a new (sandbox) project that >>> defines >>> >> a JSF 2.0 set >>> >> of components, only written via the Facelets way ? >>> >> >>> >> I had to play with some fancy JS (jQuery) to make a "wow" *easy* >>> >> component (via Facelets). >>> >> I think it would be cool to have such a library that provides a >>> kinda >>> >> wrapper for some JS lib, >>> >> e.g. jQuery. >>> >> >>> >> -Matthias >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> > >
-- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
