On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >> Oki, sounds good to me! >> >> Which things to start with? >> >> As I already explained, there may be a few scopes which might ease the life >> of a JSF developer. >> >> Another area are interceptors. Doing a @Transactional interceptor is pretty >> easy. @Secured interceptor? just a few ideas... >> >> And who is doing the project setup? > > here; the empty folder structure is enough, right ?
what name should we use "cdi" or "openwebbeans" ? I think that CDI is probably enough.. https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/ We would have a https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/cdi SOON.. -Matthias > > > >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> --- On Fri, 1/15/10, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> From: Jakob Korherr <jakob.korh...@gmail.com> >>> Subject: Re: [TOMAHAWK] CDI contributions to tomahawk? >>> To: "MyFaces Development" <dev@myfaces.apache.org> >>> Date: Friday, January 15, 2010, 1:43 AM >>> also +1 for a new extensions module! >>> >>> ..and I'd really like to contribute to that too :) >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jakob >>> >>> 2010/1/15 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> >>> >>> +1 for a new extensions >>> module >>> regards,gerhard >>> >>> >>> http://www.irian.at >>> >>> Your JSF powerhouse - >>> JSF Consulting, Development and >>> Courses in English and German >>> >>> >>> >>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >>> >>> >>> >>> 2010/1/14 Matthias Wessendorf >>> <mat...@apache.org> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hey Mark, >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi folks! >>> >>> > >>> >>> > I'm working on the Apache Implementation of >>> JSR-299 OpenWebBeans and I'm looking forward to add more >>> support for JSF-2 via providing portable CDI extensions. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > I already implemented an Extension for the >>> javax.faces.beans.ViewScoped in our openwebbeans-jsf module, >>> but honestly think that this is not the right place, because >>> it is really CDI-container independent. Plus, I have a few >>> other ideas which may serve the Apache JSF community. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > So, because those extensions are both JSF container >>> independent and also CDI container independent, what about >>> adding them to tomahawk-2 ? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > The extensions I have in mind are >>> >>> > >>> >>> > 1.) moving the CDI support for the @ViewScoped as >>> mentioned above from openwebbeans-jsf to tomahawk. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > 2.) a new @ViewConversationScoped. Usually >>> @ConversationScoped beans have the same lifecycle as >>> @RequestScoped beans if no Conversation#begin() will get >>> called in an action. Which means that one will always get a >>> fresh instance of a @ConversationScoped bean if e.g. the >>> validation fails before the begin() can be called. The >>> lifecycle of @ViewConversationScoped bean would begin with >>> the first view invocation and end at the end of the request >>> in which the conversation gets closed. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> that's neat; >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > 3.) a new @ViewRequestScoped. This is basically the >>> same as @ViewScoped, but the contextual instance will stay >>> available until the end of the request and will not get >>> destroyed after the action continues on a return >>> "nextPage";. This may be tricky if the following >>> view accesses the same bean as the previous view - any >>> suggestions on how this should behave are welcome. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> not sure I get that :-) >>> >>> >>> >>> > wdyt? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > a) is tomahawk the right place (at least for 2 and >>> 3)? >>> >>> >>> >>> No. >>> >>> Why not adding to here: >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/commons/ >>> >>> >>> >>> or >>> >>> >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org//repos/asf/myfaces/extensions/ >>> >>> >>> >>> That would make them also independent for a certain >>> component suite ;-) >>> >>> >>> >>> > b) would the functionality be useful for JSF-2 >>> developers? >>> >>> >>> >>> sounds useful to me! >>> >>> >>> >>> -Matthias >>> >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > txs and LieGrue, >>> >>> > strub >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >>> >>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
